Long-term effects of cropping system on N2O emission potential

Soren O. Petersen, Per Lennart Ambus, Lars Elsgaard, Per Schjonning, Jorgen E. Olesen

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The potential for N2O emissions outside the main growing season may be influenced by long-term effects of cropping system. This was investigated by collecting intact soil cores (100 cm3, 0-4 cm depth) under winter wheat in three organic cropping systems and a conventional reference within a long-term crop rotation experiment. Average annual inputs of C in crop residues and manure ranged from 1.7 to 3.3 Mg ha-1. A simulated freeze-thaw cycle resulted in a flush of CO2 during the first 48 h, which could be mainly from microbial sources. Other samples were adjusted to approximately -10, -30 or -100 hPa and amended with excess 15NO3- prior to freezing and thawing. Denitrification was the main source of N2O during a 72-h incubation at 22 °C, as judged from N2O and total 15N evolution. Although the input of C in the conventionally managed cropping system was significantly less than in the organic cropping systems, it showed higher N2O evolution at all three matric potentials. Estimates of relative gas diffusivity (DP/D0) in soil from the four cropping systems indicated that C input affected soil aeration. Soil from the two cropping systems with highest C input showed N2O evolution at DP/D0 in excess of 0.02, which is normally considered a threshold for development of anaerobic sites in the soil, presumably because the oxygen demand was also high. The study shows that cropping system affects both soil gas diffusivity and C availability, and that both characteristics significantly influence the N2O emission potential.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSoil Biology & Biochemistry
Volume57
Pages (from-to)706-712
Number of pages7
ISSN0038-0717
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term effects of cropping system on N2O emission potential'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this