Library and Information Science (LIS), Part 1

TY - JOUR

T1 - Library and Information Science (LIS), Part 1

AU - Hjørland, Birger

N1 - Part 1+2 are published as one article online at: http://www.isko.org/cyclo/lis

PY - 2018/5/18

Y1 - 2018/5/18

N2 - This article outlines the history of library and information science (LIS), from its roots in library scicnce, information science and documentation. It considers various conceptions or "paradigms" in the field and discusses the topical content of LIS as well as the relationships between LIS and other disciplines. The main argument of the article is that answers to all such questions concerning LIS are related to conceptions of LIS. It is argued that an updated version of social episte-mology (SE), which was founded by Egan and Shera in 1952, may in hindsight provide the most fruitful theoretical frame for IJS. SE is related to the domain-analytic approach, which was suggested by Hjorland and Albrechtsen in 1995.

AB - This article outlines the history of library and information science (LIS), from its roots in library scicnce, information science and documentation. It considers various conceptions or "paradigms" in the field and discusses the topical content of LIS as well as the relationships between LIS and other disciplines. The main argument of the article is that answers to all such questions concerning LIS are related to conceptions of LIS. It is argued that an updated version of social episte-mology (SE), which was founded by Egan and Shera in 1952, may in hindsight provide the most fruitful theoretical frame for IJS. SE is related to the domain-analytic approach, which was suggested by Hjorland and Albrechtsen in 1995.

UR - http://www.isko.org/cyclo/lis

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0943-7444

VL - 45

SP - 232

EP - 254

JO - Knowledge Organization

JF - Knowledge Organization

IS - 3

ER -