It’s a Wrap:: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays

Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta; Kasper Hornbæk; Sebastian Boring

doi:10.1145/3173574.3174138

It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays

Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Kasper Hornbæk, Sebastian Boring

Department of Computer Science

3 Citations (Scopus)

57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI
2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the sense
of agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, their
study only compared skin input to button presses and has not,
to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participants
compare skin input to both button presses and touchpad
input, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.
We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA in
skin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantly
increased compared to touchpad input. Interview
data addressing subjective experience further support these
findings. We discuss agency and the experiences associated
with skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skin
devices.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery
Publication date	20 Apr 2018
Article number	564
ISBN (Print)	9781450356206
ISBN (Electronic)	9781450356213
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174138
Publication status	Published - 20 Apr 2018
Event	ACM CHI 2018 - Montreal, Canada Duration: 21 Apr 2018 → 26 Apr 2018

Conference

Conference	ACM CHI 2018
Country/Territory	Canada
City	Montreal
Period	21/04/2018 → 26/04/2018

Access to Document

10.1145/3173574.3174138

paper564Final published version, 3.74 MB

Cite this

It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays. / Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Joanna ; Hornbæk, Kasper ; Boring, Sebastian.
CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, 2018. 564.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

@inproceedings{c9f9c6b91a424cb49df09ba8a57294a4,

title = "It{\textquoteright}s a Wrap:: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays",

abstract = "Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.",

author = "Joanna Bergstrom-Lehtovirta and Kasper Hornb{\ae}k and Sebastian Boring",

year = "2018",

month = apr,

day = "20",

doi = "10.1145/3173574.3174138",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781450356206",

booktitle = "CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

note = "ACM CHI 2018 ; Conference date: 21-04-2018 Through 26-04-2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - It’s a Wrap:

T2 - ACM CHI 2018

AU - Bergstrom-Lehtovirta, Joanna

AU - Hornbæk, Kasper

AU - Boring, Sebastian

PY - 2018/4/20

Y1 - 2018/4/20

N2 - Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.

AB - Input on the skin is emerging as an interaction style. At CHI2012, Coyle and colleagues identified an increase in the senseof agency (SoA) as one benefit of skin input. However, theirstudy only compared skin input to button presses and has not,to our knowledge, been replicated. Therefore, we had 24 participantscompare skin input to both button presses and touchpadinput, measuring SoA using the Libet Clock paradigm.We replicate previous findings regarding increased SoA inskin versus button input and also find that SoA for skin is significantlyincreased compared to touchpad input. Interviewdata addressing subjective experience further support thesefindings. We discuss agency and the experiences associatedwith skin input, as well as differences to input with non-skindevices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046937743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3173574.3174138

DO - 10.1145/3173574.3174138

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9781450356206

BT - CHI '18 Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

Y2 - 21 April 2018 through 26 April 2018

ER -

It’s a Wrap: Mapping On-Skin Input to Off-Skin Displays

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this