Is once enough? on the extent and content of replications in human-computer interaction

Kasper Hornbæk, Søren S. Sander, Javier Andrés Bargas-Avila, Jakob Grue Simonsen

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A replication is an attempt to confirm an earlier study's findings. It is often claimed that research in Human- Computer Interaction (HCI) contains too few replications. To investigate this claim we examined four publication outlets (891 papers) and found 3% attempting replication of an earlier result. The replications typically confirmed earlier findings, but treated replication as a confirm/not-confirm decision, rarely analyzing effect sizes or comparing in depth to the replicated paper. When asked, most authors agreed that their studies were replications, but rarely planned them as such. Many non-replication studies could have corroborated earlier work if they had analyzed data differently or used minimal effort to collect extra data. We discuss what these results mean to HCI, including how reporting of studies could be improved and how conferences/journals may change author instructions to get more replications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Number of pages10
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publication date2014
Pages3523-3532
ISBN (Print)978-1-4503-2473-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
EventSIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2014 - Toronto, Canada
Duration: 26 Apr 20141 May 2014

Conference

ConferenceSIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2014
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityToronto
Period26/04/201401/05/2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is once enough? on the extent and content of replications in human-computer interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this