Abstract
A replication is an attempt to confirm an earlier study's findings. It is often claimed that research in Human- Computer Interaction (HCI) contains too few replications. To investigate this claim we examined four publication outlets (891 papers) and found 3% attempting replication of an earlier result. The replications typically confirmed earlier findings, but treated replication as a confirm/not-confirm decision, rarely analyzing effect sizes or comparing in depth to the replicated paper. When asked, most authors agreed that their studies were replications, but rarely planned them as such. Many non-replication studies could have corroborated earlier work if they had analyzed data differently or used minimal effort to collect extra data. We discuss what these results mean to HCI, including how reporting of studies could be improved and how conferences/journals may change author instructions to get more replications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems |
Number of pages | 10 |
Publisher | Association for Computing Machinery |
Publication date | 2014 |
Pages | 3523-3532 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-1-4503-2473-1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Event | SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2014 - Toronto, Canada Duration: 26 Apr 2014 → 1 May 2014 |
Conference
Conference | SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2014 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | Canada |
City | Toronto |
Period | 26/04/2014 → 01/05/2014 |