Introduction: The Dialectics of Displacement and Emplacement

Henrik Erdman Vigh, Jesper Bjarnesen

    Abstract

    Wars unsettle our commonsense understandings of movement and mobility. Simultaneously entropic and inertial, they conjure up images of rampant disorder and chaos as well as strained and crippled formations locked in negative tension. On the one hand, detrimental movement; on the other, deadly stalemate. Both mobility and immobility are, as such, associated with the iconography of warfare and conflicts. They may be presented as out of time through pictures of empty streets, ruins, trenches, and dead bodies frozen in contorted positions, yet, conversely, some of the most archetypical images of war connote speed, flows, and movement, seen in images of troop advances or retreats, rows of traveling refugees, and hauls of humanitarian aid shipped or flown into airports and harbors from afar. In temporal terms, conflict and violence are oft en represented in the lethargy of decay or the entropy of aggression.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalConflict and Society
    Volume2
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)9-15
    Number of pages7
    ISSN2164-4543
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Introduction: The Dialectics of Displacement and Emplacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this