TY - JOUR
T1 - Interval training does not modulate diastolic function in heart transplant recipients
AU - Monk-Hansen, Tea
AU - Dall, Christian
AU - Christensen, Stefan B.
AU - Snoer, Martin
AU - Gustafsson, Finn
AU - Rasmusen, Hanne
AU - Prescott, Eva
PY - 2014/4
Y1 - 2014/4
N2 - Objectives. This study investigates the effect of aerobic interval training on diastolic function at rest and during exercise in stable heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Design. Twenty-three stable HTx recipients (74% males, mean age 50 ± 14.9 years) were recruited to a training programme. Intervention was 8 weeks intensive training or control in a randomized controlled design. Results. At baseline, participants had normal or mild diastolic dysfunction at rest. During exercise, mean E/e′ increased from 9.0 (± 2.8) to 12.8 (± 7.7) (p = 0.09), E/A increased from 2.1 (± 0.6) to 2.6 (± 0.7) (p = 0.02), and deceleration time decreased by over 50 ms, all markers of increased filling pressure. There were no correlations between diastolic function and VO2peak at baseline. After intervention VO2peak increased from 23.9 (± 4.5) to 28.3(± 6) ml/kg/min in the training group (difference between groups p = 0.0018). No consistent pattern of improvement in diastolic function at rest or during exercise was seen. Conclusion. The study does not support a role of diastolic dysfunction in the limited exercise capacity of HTx recipients and suggests that in these patients peripheral factors are of greater importance.
AB - Objectives. This study investigates the effect of aerobic interval training on diastolic function at rest and during exercise in stable heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Design. Twenty-three stable HTx recipients (74% males, mean age 50 ± 14.9 years) were recruited to a training programme. Intervention was 8 weeks intensive training or control in a randomized controlled design. Results. At baseline, participants had normal or mild diastolic dysfunction at rest. During exercise, mean E/e′ increased from 9.0 (± 2.8) to 12.8 (± 7.7) (p = 0.09), E/A increased from 2.1 (± 0.6) to 2.6 (± 0.7) (p = 0.02), and deceleration time decreased by over 50 ms, all markers of increased filling pressure. There were no correlations between diastolic function and VO2peak at baseline. After intervention VO2peak increased from 23.9 (± 4.5) to 28.3(± 6) ml/kg/min in the training group (difference between groups p = 0.0018). No consistent pattern of improvement in diastolic function at rest or during exercise was seen. Conclusion. The study does not support a role of diastolic dysfunction in the limited exercise capacity of HTx recipients and suggests that in these patients peripheral factors are of greater importance.
U2 - 10.3109/14017431.2013.871058
DO - 10.3109/14017431.2013.871058
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 24320690
SN - 1401-7431
VL - 48
SP - 91
EP - 98
JO - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
JF - Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
IS - 2
ER -