Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Copenhagen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Press/Media
Activities
Prizes
???studenttheses???
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Interpreting the ‘Quality of Law’ at the European Court of Human Rights: Metaphorical Framing and Evaluative Judgment
Jacob Livingston Slosser
Centre of Excellence for International Courts and Governance
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreting the ‘Quality of Law’ at the European Court of Human Rights: Metaphorical Framing and Evaluative Judgment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
100%
Modulating Factors
50%
Contracting Parties
50%
Judicial Reasoning
50%
Legal Language
50%
Cognitive Linguistics
50%
Pleadings
50%
Law
50%
Dissent
50%
Arts and Humanities
Framing
100%
Law
100%
European Court of Human Rights
100%
Salience
33%
Legal Language
33%
Indicative
33%
reliance
33%
Cognitive Linguistics
33%
Dissent
33%