International Justice through Domestic Courts: Challenges in Brazil’s Judicial Review of the Amnesty Law

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Justice through Domestic Courts:

T2 - Challenges in Brazil’s Judicial Review of the Amnesty Law

AU - Tang, Yi Shin

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - In April 2010, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, or STF) controversially decided to uphold the country’s amnesty law, which currently prevents prosecutions for violations of human rights committed during the military dictatorship. However, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights immediately followed with an opposing view in the Araguaia case, declaring that the amnesty law lacks effect under the American Convention on Human Rights. Brazilian society now faces an unprecedented challenge: can it expect its domestic courts to implement such international obligations? Drawing upon the prospects that a renewed STF may revisit the case in response to the mounting pressures of Araguaia, this article examines the complex legal issues that remain around the enforceability of international justice under Brazil’s constitutional framework. The analysis suggests that different judicial strategies could still be explored in order to shift the STF’s stance towards a more consistent application of international human rights principles.

AB - In April 2010, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, or STF) controversially decided to uphold the country’s amnesty law, which currently prevents prosecutions for violations of human rights committed during the military dictatorship. However, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights immediately followed with an opposing view in the Araguaia case, declaring that the amnesty law lacks effect under the American Convention on Human Rights. Brazilian society now faces an unprecedented challenge: can it expect its domestic courts to implement such international obligations? Drawing upon the prospects that a renewed STF may revisit the case in response to the mounting pressures of Araguaia, this article examines the complex legal issues that remain around the enforceability of international justice under Brazil’s constitutional framework. The analysis suggests that different judicial strategies could still be explored in order to shift the STF’s stance towards a more consistent application of international human rights principles.

U2 - 10.1093/ijtj/ijv007

DO - 10.1093/ijtj/ijv007

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1752-7716

VL - 9

SP - 259

EP - 277

JO - International Journal of Transitional Justice

JF - International Journal of Transitional Justice

IS - 2

ER -