Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment

Audrey de Nazelle, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, Josep M Antó, Michael Brauer, David Briggs, Charlotte Braun-Fahrlander, Nick Cavill, Ashley R Cooper, Hélène Desqueyroux, Scott Fruin, Gerard Hoek, Luc Int Panis, Nicole Janssen, Michael Jerrett, Michael Joffe, Zorana Jovanovic Andersen, Elise van Kempen, Simon Kingham, Nadine Kubesch, Kevin M LeydenJulian D Marshall, Jaume Matamala, Giorgos Mellios, Michelle Mendez, Hala Nassif, David Ogilvie, Rosana Peiró, Katherine Pérez, Ari Rabl, Martina Ragettli, Daniel Rodríguez, David Rojas, Pablo Ruiz, James F Sallis, Jeroen Terwoert, Jean-François Toussaint, Jouni Tuomisto, Moniek Zuurbier, Erik Lebret

336 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Substantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences. Objectives and methods: We review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions. Results and discussion: Policies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time. Conclusion: Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironment International
Volume37
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)766-77
Number of pages12
ISSN0160-4120
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • Accidents, Traffic
  • Air Pollution
  • Bicycling
  • Environmental Exposure
  • Environmental Policy
  • Exercise
  • Health Behavior
  • Health Policy
  • Health Status
  • Hot Temperature
  • Humans
  • Noise, Transportation
  • Sunlight
  • Transportation
  • Travel
  • Walking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this