Impact of implantable defibrillators and resynchronization therapy on outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction--a meta-analysis

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of implantable defibrillators and resynchronization therapy on outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction--a meta-analysis

AU - Abdulla, Jawdat

AU - Haarbo, Jens

AU - Køber, Lars

AU - Torp-Pedersen, Christian

N1 - Keywords: Defibrillators, Implantable; Humans; Pacemaker, Artificial; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are debated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate by a meta-analysis the effect of CRT and prophylactic ICD therapy in patients with LVSD. METHODS: Eligible trials evaluating the effect of CRT vs. no-CRT, ICD vs. no-ICD and adding ICD to CRT vs. no-ICD were selected and meta-analyzed. The outcomes were: all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, hospitalization for heart failure and change in exercise tolerance and New York Heart Association class. RESULTS: Implantation of CRT reduced all cause mortality odds ratio (OR) = 0.73 (0.60-0.89) p = 0.002 and hospitalization for heart failure OR = 0.60 (0.45, 0.80) p = 0.001, increased peak oxygen consumption by 1.77 (0.32-3.22) ml/kg/min p = 0.017 and improved New York Heart Association class by at least one class with OR = 1.52 (1.30, 1.77) p < 0.0001. Implantation of ICD reduced all-cause mortality OR = 0.75 (0.59-0.96) p = 0.025 and cardiac mortality OR = 0.63 (0.48, 0.82) p = 0.001. Adding ICD to CRT reduced all cause mortality OR = 0.69 (0.53-0.91) p = 0.008. CONCLUSION: Selective patients with LVSD benefit from CRT, ICD or both. Further investigations are necessary to clarify which patients benefit most from a single or combined device implantation.

AB - BACKGROUND: The clinical benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) are debated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate by a meta-analysis the effect of CRT and prophylactic ICD therapy in patients with LVSD. METHODS: Eligible trials evaluating the effect of CRT vs. no-CRT, ICD vs. no-ICD and adding ICD to CRT vs. no-ICD were selected and meta-analyzed. The outcomes were: all cause mortality, cardiac mortality, hospitalization for heart failure and change in exercise tolerance and New York Heart Association class. RESULTS: Implantation of CRT reduced all cause mortality odds ratio (OR) = 0.73 (0.60-0.89) p = 0.002 and hospitalization for heart failure OR = 0.60 (0.45, 0.80) p = 0.001, increased peak oxygen consumption by 1.77 (0.32-3.22) ml/kg/min p = 0.017 and improved New York Heart Association class by at least one class with OR = 1.52 (1.30, 1.77) p < 0.0001. Implantation of ICD reduced all-cause mortality OR = 0.75 (0.59-0.96) p = 0.025 and cardiac mortality OR = 0.63 (0.48, 0.82) p = 0.001. Adding ICD to CRT reduced all cause mortality OR = 0.69 (0.53-0.91) p = 0.008. CONCLUSION: Selective patients with LVSD benefit from CRT, ICD or both. Further investigations are necessary to clarify which patients benefit most from a single or combined device implantation.

U2 - 10.1159/000093234

DO - 10.1159/000093234

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16707863

SN - 0008-6312

VL - 106

SP - 249

EP - 255

JO - Cardiologia

JF - Cardiologia

IS - 4

ER -