How should death be taken into account in welfare assessments?

Karsten Klint Jensen*

*Corresponding author for this work
3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

That death is not a welfare issue appears to be a widespread view among animal welfare researchers. This paper demonstrates that this view is based on a mistaken assumption about harm, which is coupled to ‘welfare’ being conceived as ‘welfare at a time’. Assessments of welfare at a time ignore issues of longevity. In order to assess the welfare issue of death, it is necessary to structure welfare assessment as comparisons of possible lives of the animals. The paper also demonstrates that excluding the welfare issues of being deprived of life from the ethical assessment of killing distorts the ethical considerations.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
Volume30
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)615-623
Number of pages9
ISSN1187-7863
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Aggregation across times
  • Life-time welfare
  • Welfare at a time

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How should death be taken into account in welfare assessments?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this