How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs

Philipp S. Duncker, Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen, Per Gundersen, Klaus Katzensteiner, Johnny De Jong, Hans Peter Ravn, Mike Smith, Otto Eckmüllner, Heinrich Spiecker

    113 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Forest ecosystems deliver multiple goods and services and, traditionally, forest owners tend to have a high interest
    in goods in the form of merchantable wood. As a consequence, forest management often aims to increase timber production and
    economic returns through intervention into natural processes. However, forests provide further services, including carbon
    sequestration, water quantity and quality, and preservation of biodiversity. In order to develop and implement strategies for
    sustainable forest management, it is important to anticipate the long-term effects of different forest management alternatives on
    the ability of the forest to provide ecosystem goods and services. Management objectives might emphasize economic interests
    at the expense of other services. Very few attempts have been made to illustrate and evaluate quantitatively the relationship
    between forest goods and services. By use of virtual but realistic datasets, we quantified, for multiple services, the effects of
    five forest management alternatives that form an intensity gradient. Our virtual forest management units represented Central
    European forest ecosystems in the submontane vegetation zone under a humid–temperate climate with acidic soils. In this zone
    the European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is the dominant tree species. In order to assess the effects on ecosystem services, the
    untouched natural forest reserve served as a reference. Wherever possible, response functions were deduced to couple the various
    services via stand-level data to demonstrate trade-offs between the services. Management units comprised all development
    phases in the sense of a "normal forest". It was clearly illustrated that maximizing the rates of biomass production and carbon
    sequestration may conflict with protection of authentic biodiversity. Several silvicultural operations may, however, have positive
    effects on biodiversity and water protection without high costs. We also illustrated that water quality and maintenance of soil
    fertility may be affected either positively or negatively by several forest management operations. In contrast, water quantity was
    only minimally influenced by forest management. For the virtual forest in a humid climate, differences of 70 mm/yr in runoff
    were negligible. Under dry continental conditions, however, such differences may have important implications for groundwater
    formation.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalEcology and Society
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    Number of pages17
    ISSN1708-3087
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Cite this