Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator

Helmut Segner; Henrik  Sundh; Kurt Buchmann; Jessica Douxfils; Kristina Snuttan Sundell; Cédric Mathieu; Neil Ruane; Fredrik Jutfelt; Hilde Toften; Lloyd Vaughan

doi:10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9

Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator

Helmut Segner, Henrik Sundh, Kurt Buchmann, Jessica Douxfils, Kristina Snuttan Sundell, Cédric Mathieu, Neil Ruane, Fredrik Jutfelt, Hilde Toften, Lloyd Vaughan

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This brief review focuses on health and biological function as cornerstones of fish welfare. From the function-based point of view, good welfare is reflected in the ability of the animal to cope with infectious and non-infectious stressors, thereby maintaining homeostasis and good health, whereas stressful husbandry conditions and protracted suffering will lead to the loss of the coping ability and, thus, to impaired health. In the first part of the review, the physiological processes through which stressful husbandry conditions modulate health of farmed fish are examined. If fish are subjected to unfavourable husbandry conditions, the resulting disruption of internal homeostasis necessitates energy-demanding physiological adjustments (allostasis/acclimation). The ensuing energy drain leads to trade-offs with other energy-demanding processes such as the functioning of the primary epithelial barriers (gut, skin, gills) and the immune system. Understanding of the relation between husbandry conditions, allostatic responses and fish health provides the basis for the second theme developed in this review, the potential use of biological function and health parameters as operational welfare indicators (OWIs). Advantages of function- and health-related parameters are that they are relatively straightforward to recognize and to measure and are routinely monitored in most aquaculture units, thereby providing feasible tools to assess fish welfare under practical farming conditions. As the efforts to improve fish welfare and environmental sustainability lead to increasingly diverse solutions, in particular integrated production, it is imperative that we have objective OWIs to compare with other production forms, such as high-density aquaculture. However, to receive the necessary acceptance for legislation, more robust scientific backing of the health- and function-related OWIs is urgently needed.

Original language	English
Journal	Fish Physiology & Biochemistry
Volume	38
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	85-105
Number of pages	21
ISSN	0920-1742
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9
Publication status	Published - Feb 2012

Keywords

Former LIFE faculty

Access to Document

10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9

Cite this

@article{3b9f55795b6d40f9bada4c87b83e9569,

title = "Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator",

abstract = "This brief review focuses on health and biological function as cornerstones of fish welfare. From the function-based point of view, good welfare is reflected in the ability of the animal to cope with infectious and non-infectious stressors, thereby maintaining homeostasis and good health, whereas stressful husbandry conditions and protracted suffering will lead to the loss of the coping ability and, thus, to impaired health. In the first part of the review, the physiological processes through which stressful husbandry conditions modulate health of farmed fish are examined. If fish are subjected to unfavourable husbandry conditions, the resulting disruption of internal homeostasis necessitates energy-demanding physiological adjustments (allostasis/acclimation). The ensuing energy drain leads to trade-offs with other energy-demanding processes such as the functioning of the primary epithelial barriers (gut, skin, gills) and the immune system. Understanding of the relation between husbandry conditions, allostatic responses and fish health provides the basis for the second theme developed in this review, the potential use of biological function and health parameters as operational welfare indicators (OWIs). Advantages of function- and health-related parameters are that they are relatively straightforward to recognize and to measure and are routinely monitored in most aquaculture units, thereby providing feasible tools to assess fish welfare under practical farming conditions. As the efforts to improve fish welfare and environmental sustainability lead to increasingly diverse solutions, in particular integrated production, it is imperative that we have objective OWIs to compare with other production forms, such as high-density aquaculture. However, to receive the necessary acceptance for legislation, more robust scientific backing of the health- and function-related OWIs is urgently needed.",

keywords = "Former LIFE faculty, Fish, Welfare, Health, Disease, Stress, Welfare indicator, Epithelial barrier, Allostasis",

author = "Helmut Segner and Henrik Sundh and Kurt Buchmann and Jessica Douxfils and Sundell, {Kristina Snuttan} and C{\'e}dric Mathieu and Neil Ruane and Fredrik Jutfelt and Hilde Toften and Lloyd Vaughan",

year = "2012",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9",

language = "English",

volume = "38",

pages = "85--105",

journal = "Fish Physiology & Biochemistry",

issn = "0920-1742",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health of farmed fish

T2 - its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator

AU - Segner, Helmut

AU - Sundh, Henrik

AU - Buchmann, Kurt

AU - Douxfils, Jessica

AU - Sundell, Kristina Snuttan

AU - Mathieu, Cédric

AU - Ruane, Neil

AU - Jutfelt, Fredrik

AU - Toften, Hilde

AU - Vaughan, Lloyd

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - This brief review focuses on health and biological function as cornerstones of fish welfare. From the function-based point of view, good welfare is reflected in the ability of the animal to cope with infectious and non-infectious stressors, thereby maintaining homeostasis and good health, whereas stressful husbandry conditions and protracted suffering will lead to the loss of the coping ability and, thus, to impaired health. In the first part of the review, the physiological processes through which stressful husbandry conditions modulate health of farmed fish are examined. If fish are subjected to unfavourable husbandry conditions, the resulting disruption of internal homeostasis necessitates energy-demanding physiological adjustments (allostasis/acclimation). The ensuing energy drain leads to trade-offs with other energy-demanding processes such as the functioning of the primary epithelial barriers (gut, skin, gills) and the immune system. Understanding of the relation between husbandry conditions, allostatic responses and fish health provides the basis for the second theme developed in this review, the potential use of biological function and health parameters as operational welfare indicators (OWIs). Advantages of function- and health-related parameters are that they are relatively straightforward to recognize and to measure and are routinely monitored in most aquaculture units, thereby providing feasible tools to assess fish welfare under practical farming conditions. As the efforts to improve fish welfare and environmental sustainability lead to increasingly diverse solutions, in particular integrated production, it is imperative that we have objective OWIs to compare with other production forms, such as high-density aquaculture. However, to receive the necessary acceptance for legislation, more robust scientific backing of the health- and function-related OWIs is urgently needed.

AB - This brief review focuses on health and biological function as cornerstones of fish welfare. From the function-based point of view, good welfare is reflected in the ability of the animal to cope with infectious and non-infectious stressors, thereby maintaining homeostasis and good health, whereas stressful husbandry conditions and protracted suffering will lead to the loss of the coping ability and, thus, to impaired health. In the first part of the review, the physiological processes through which stressful husbandry conditions modulate health of farmed fish are examined. If fish are subjected to unfavourable husbandry conditions, the resulting disruption of internal homeostasis necessitates energy-demanding physiological adjustments (allostasis/acclimation). The ensuing energy drain leads to trade-offs with other energy-demanding processes such as the functioning of the primary epithelial barriers (gut, skin, gills) and the immune system. Understanding of the relation between husbandry conditions, allostatic responses and fish health provides the basis for the second theme developed in this review, the potential use of biological function and health parameters as operational welfare indicators (OWIs). Advantages of function- and health-related parameters are that they are relatively straightforward to recognize and to measure and are routinely monitored in most aquaculture units, thereby providing feasible tools to assess fish welfare under practical farming conditions. As the efforts to improve fish welfare and environmental sustainability lead to increasingly diverse solutions, in particular integrated production, it is imperative that we have objective OWIs to compare with other production forms, such as high-density aquaculture. However, to receive the necessary acceptance for legislation, more robust scientific backing of the health- and function-related OWIs is urgently needed.

KW - Former LIFE faculty

KW - Fish

KW - Welfare

KW - Health

KW - Disease

KW - Stress

KW - Welfare indicator

KW - Epithelial barrier

KW - Allostasis

U2 - 10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9

DO - 10.1007/s10695-011-9517-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21681416

SN - 0920-1742

VL - 38

SP - 85

EP - 105

JO - Fish Physiology & Biochemistry

JF - Fish Physiology & Biochemistry

IS - 1

ER -

Health of farmed fish: its relation to fish welfare and its utility as welfare indicator

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this