Hatred Beyond Bigotry

Thomas Brudholm

doi:10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004

Hatred Beyond Bigotry

Department of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies

Abstract

This chapter ponders the value of a focused conceptual examination of hatred for the combating of hate. A common argument found in much scholarship on hate crime and hate speech is that the term “hate” is misleading, and that bias or prejudice does a better job. However, this assertion is generally based on scanty consideration as to the concept of hatred itself. In order to qualify the conversation about hatred today, the chapter returns to Plato’s conceptualization of misology in the Phaedo and Aristotle’s account of hatred in the Rhetoric. This exploration among other things shows that there is a long tradition for thinking about certain forms of hatred as prejudice, but also that hatred can be approached as a reasonable and reason responsive feeling, rather than simply irrational and bad. The chapter mobilizes these philosophical readings for the purpose of reconsidering the question whether “hate” is indeed a misnomer.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Hate, Politics, Law : Critical Perspectives on Combating Hate
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Publication date	1 Jan 2018
Chapter	3
ISBN (Print)	9780190465544
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2018

Series	Studies in Penal Theory and Philosophy

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004

Cite this

@inbook{98d35cee8bca406da339570c5eca1c50,

title = "Hatred Beyond Bigotry",

abstract = "This chapter ponders the value of a focused conceptual examination of hatred for the combating of hate. A common argument found in much scholarship on hate crime and hate speech is that the term “hate” is misleading, and that bias or prejudice does a better job. However, this assertion is generally based on scanty consideration as to the concept of hatred itself. In order to qualify the conversation about hatred today, the chapter returns to Plato{\textquoteright}s conceptualization of misology in the Phaedo and Aristotle{\textquoteright}s account of hatred in the Rhetoric. This exploration among other things shows that there is a long tradition for thinking about certain forms of hatred as prejudice, but also that hatred can be approached as a reasonable and reason responsive feeling, rather than simply irrational and bad. The chapter mobilizes these philosophical readings for the purpose of reconsidering the question whether “hate” is indeed a misnomer.",

author = "Thomas Brudholm",

year = "2018",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004",

language = "English",

isbn = " 9780190465544",

series = "Studies in Penal Theory and Philosophy",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

booktitle = "Hate, Politics, Law",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hatred Beyond Bigotry

AU - Brudholm, Thomas

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - This chapter ponders the value of a focused conceptual examination of hatred for the combating of hate. A common argument found in much scholarship on hate crime and hate speech is that the term “hate” is misleading, and that bias or prejudice does a better job. However, this assertion is generally based on scanty consideration as to the concept of hatred itself. In order to qualify the conversation about hatred today, the chapter returns to Plato’s conceptualization of misology in the Phaedo and Aristotle’s account of hatred in the Rhetoric. This exploration among other things shows that there is a long tradition for thinking about certain forms of hatred as prejudice, but also that hatred can be approached as a reasonable and reason responsive feeling, rather than simply irrational and bad. The chapter mobilizes these philosophical readings for the purpose of reconsidering the question whether “hate” is indeed a misnomer.

AB - This chapter ponders the value of a focused conceptual examination of hatred for the combating of hate. A common argument found in much scholarship on hate crime and hate speech is that the term “hate” is misleading, and that bias or prejudice does a better job. However, this assertion is generally based on scanty consideration as to the concept of hatred itself. In order to qualify the conversation about hatred today, the chapter returns to Plato’s conceptualization of misology in the Phaedo and Aristotle’s account of hatred in the Rhetoric. This exploration among other things shows that there is a long tradition for thinking about certain forms of hatred as prejudice, but also that hatred can be approached as a reasonable and reason responsive feeling, rather than simply irrational and bad. The chapter mobilizes these philosophical readings for the purpose of reconsidering the question whether “hate” is indeed a misnomer.

U2 - 10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004

DO - 10.1093/oso/9780190465544.003.0004

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9780190465544

T3 - Studies in Penal Theory and Philosophy

BT - Hate, Politics, Law

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Hatred Beyond Bigotry

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this