Harmonisation of stem volume estimates in European National Forest Inventories

Thomas Gschwantner, Iciar Alberdi, András Balázs, Sébastien Bauwens, Susann Bender, Dragan Borota, Michal Bosela, Olivier Bouriaud, Isabel Cañellas, Jānis Donis, Alexandra Freudenschuß, Jean-Christophe Hervé, David Hladnik, Jurģis Jansons, László Kolozs, Kari T. Korhonen, Milos Kucera, Gintaras Kulbokas, Andrius Kuliešis, Adrian LanzPhilippe Lejeune, Torgny Lind, Gheorghe Marin, François Morneau, Dóra Nagy, Thomas Nord-Larsen, Leónia Nunes, Damjan Pantić, Joana A. Paulo, Tomas Pikula, John Redmond, Francisco C. Rego, Thomas Riedel, Laurent Saint-André, Vladimír Šebeň, Allan Sims, Mitja Skudnik, György Solti, Stein M. Tomter, Mark Twomey, Bertil Westerlund, Jürgen Zell

13 Citations (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Key message: Volume predictions of sample trees are basic inputs for essential National Forest Inventory (NFI) estimates. The predicted volumes are rarely comparable among European NFIs because of country-specific dbh-thresholds and differences regarding the inclusion of the tree parts stump, stem top, and branches. Twenty-one European NFIs implemented harmonisation measures to provide consistent stem volume predictions for comparable forest resource estimates. Context: The harmonisation of forest information has become increasingly important. International programs and interest groups from the wood industry, energy, and environmental sectors require comparable information. European NFIs as primary source of forest information are well-placed to support policies and decision-making processes with harmonised estimates. Aims: The main objectives were to present the implementation of stem volume harmonisation by European NFIs, to obtain comparable growing stocks according to five reference definitions, and to compare the different results. Methods: The applied harmonisation approach identifies the deviations between country-level and common reference definitions. The deviations are minimised through country-specific bridging functions. Growing stocks were calculated from the un-harmonised, and harmonised stem volume estimates and comparisons were made. Results: The country-level growing stock results differ from the Cost Action E43 reference definition between − 8 and + 32%. Stumps and stem tops together account for 4 to 13% of stem volume, and large branches constitute 3 to 21% of broadleaved growing stock. Up to 6% of stem volume is allocated below the dbh-threshold. Conclusion: Comparable volume figures are available for the first time on a large-scale in Europe. The results indicate the importance of harmonisation for international forest statistics. The presented work contributes to the NFI harmonisation process in Europe in several ways regarding comparable NFI reporting and scenario modelling.

Original languageEnglish
Article number24
JournalAnnals of Forest Science
Volume76
Number of pages23
ISSN1286-4560
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Harmonisation of stem volume estimates in European National Forest Inventories'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this