Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing

Simon J. More; Dominique Bicout; Anette Bøtner; Andrew Butterworth; Paolo Calistri; Klaus Depner; Sandra Edwards; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Margaret Good; Christian  Gortazar Schmidt; Miguel Angel Miranda; Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Antonio Velarde; Hans-Hermann Thulke; Liisa Sihvonen; Hans Spoolder; Jan Arend Stegeman; Mohan Raj; Preben Willeberg; Christoph Winckler; Remigio Marano; Frank Verdonck; Denise Candiani; Virginie Michel

doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343

Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing

Simon J. More, Dominique Bicout, Anette Bøtner, Andrew Butterworth, Paolo Calistri, Klaus Depner, Sandra Edwards, Bruno Garin-Bastuji, Margaret Good, Christian Gortazar Schmidt, Miguel Angel Miranda, Søren Saxmose Nielsen, Antonio Velarde, Hans-Hermann Thulke, Liisa Sihvonen, Hans Spoolder, Jan Arend Stegeman, Mohan Raj, Preben Willeberg, Christoph WincklerRemigio Marano, Frank Verdonck, Denise Candiani, Virginie Michel

4 Citations (Scopus)

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion.

Original language	English
Article number	e05343
Journal	EFSA Journal
Volume	16
Issue number	7
Number of pages	35
ISSN	1831-4732
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343
Publication status	Published - 19 Jul 2018

Access to Document

10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343Licence: CC BY-ND

Guidance for Assessment on stunningFinal published version, 3.73 MBLicence: CC BY-ND

Cite this

More, S. J., Bicout, D., Bøtner, A., Butterworth, A., Calistri, P., Depner, K., Edwards, S., Garin-Bastuji, B., Good, M., Gortazar Schmidt, C., Miranda, M. A., Nielsen, S. S., Velarde, A., Thulke, H.-H., Sihvonen, L., Spoolder, H., Stegeman, J. A., Raj, M., Willeberg, P., ... Michel, V. (2018). Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing. EFSA Journal, 16(7), Article e05343. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343

More, SJ, Bicout, D, Bøtner, A, Butterworth, A, Calistri, P, Depner, K, Edwards, S, Garin-Bastuji, B, Good, M, Gortazar Schmidt, C, Miranda, MA, Nielsen, SS, Velarde, A, Thulke, H-H, Sihvonen, L, Spoolder, H, Stegeman, JA, Raj, M, Willeberg, P, Winckler, C, Marano, R, Verdonck, F, Candiani, D & Michel, V 2018, 'Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing', EFSA Journal, vol. 16, no. 7, e05343. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343

@article{8679f3281e11410f937dc1c7230c7bd7,

title = "Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing",

abstract = "This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion.",

author = "More, {Simon J.} and Dominique Bicout and Anette B{\o}tner and Andrew Butterworth and Paolo Calistri and Klaus Depner and Sandra Edwards and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and Margaret Good and {Gortazar Schmidt}, Christian and Miranda, {Miguel Angel} and Nielsen, {S{\o}ren Saxmose} and Antonio Velarde and Hans-Hermann Thulke and Liisa Sihvonen and Hans Spoolder and Stegeman, {Jan Arend} and Mohan Raj and Preben Willeberg and Christoph Winckler and Remigio Marano and Frank Verdonck and Denise Candiani and Virginie Michel",

year = "2018",

month = jul,

day = "19",

doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343",

language = "English",

volume = "16",

journal = "EFSA Journal",

issn = "1831-4732",

publisher = "European Food Safety Authority (E F S A)",

number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing

AU - More, Simon J.

AU - Bicout, Dominique

AU - Bøtner, Anette

AU - Butterworth, Andrew

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Depner, Klaus

AU - Edwards, Sandra

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Good, Margaret

AU - Gortazar Schmidt, Christian

AU - Miranda, Miguel Angel

AU - Nielsen, Søren Saxmose

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Thulke, Hans-Hermann

AU - Sihvonen, Liisa

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend

AU - Raj, Mohan

AU - Willeberg, Preben

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - Marano, Remigio

AU - Verdonck, Frank

AU - Candiani, Denise

AU - Michel, Virginie

PY - 2018/7/19

Y1 - 2018/7/19

N2 - This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion.

AB - This guidance defines the process for handling applications on new or modified stunning methods and the parameters that will be assessed by the EFSA Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) Panel. The applications, received through the European Commission, should contain administrative information, a checklist of data to be submitted and a technical dossier. The dossier should include two or more studies (in laboratory and slaughterhouse conditions) reporting all parameters and methodological aspects that are indicated in the guidance. The applications will first be scrutinised by the EFSA's Applications Desk (APDESK) Unit for verification of the completeness of the data submitted for the risk assessment of the stunning method. If the application is considered not valid, additional information may be requested from the applicant. If considered valid, it will be subjected to assessment phase 1 where the data related to parameters for the scientific evaluation of the stunning method will be examined by the AHAW Panel. Such parameters focus on the stunning method and the outcomes of interest, i.e. immediate onset of unconsciousness or the absence of avoidable pain, distress and suffering until the loss of consciousness and duration of the unconsciousness (until death). The applicant should also propose methodologies and results to assess the equivalence with existing stunning methods in terms of welfare outcomes. Applications passing assessment phase 1 will be subjected to the following phase 2 which will be carried out by the AHAW Panel and focuses on the animal welfare risk assessment. In this phase, the Panel will assess the outcomes, conclusions and discussion proposed by the applicant. The results of the assessment will be published in a scientific opinion.

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5343

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1831-4732

VL - 16

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

IS - 7

M1 - e05343

ER -

Guidance on the assessment criteria for applications for new or modified stunning methods regarding animal protection at the time of killing

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this