Gingival recession following apical surgery in the esthetic zone: a clinical study with 70 cases

Thomas von Arx, Giovanni E Salvi, Simone Janner, Simon S Jensen

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study evaluated gingival recession 1 year following apical surgery of 70 maxillary anterior teeth (central and lateral incisors, canines, and first premolars). A visual assessment of the mid-facial aspect of the gingival level and of papillary heights of treated teeth was carried out using photographs taken at pre-treatment and 1-year follow-up appointments. In addition, changes in the gingival margin (GM) and clinical attachment levels (CAL) were calculated with the use of clinical measurements, that is, pre-treatment and 1-year follow-up pocket probing depth and level of gingival margin. Changes in GM and CAL were then correlated with patient-, tooth-, and surgery-related parameters. The following parameters were found to significantly influence changes in GM and CAL over time: gingival biotype (P < 0.05), with thin biotype exhibiting more gingival recession than thick biotype; pre-treatment pocket probing depth (PPD) (P < 0.03), with cases of pre-treatment PPD < 2.5 mm demonstrating more attachment loss than cases of PPD > or = 2.5 mm; and type of incision (P < 0.01), with the submarginal incision showing considerably less gingival recession compared with the intrasulcular incision, papilla-base incision or papilla-saving incision. The visual assessment using pre-treatment and 1-year follow-up photographs did not demonstrate significant changes in gingival level or papillary height after apical surgery. In conclusion, gingival biotype, pre-treatment PPD, and type of incision may significantly influence changes in GM and CAL following apical surgery in maxillary anterior teeth.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
Volume4
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)28-45
Number of pages17
ISSN1862-0612
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gingival recession following apical surgery in the esthetic zone: a clinical study with 70 cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this