Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research

Shane Desselle; Aleda  Chen; Mohamed  Amin; Parisa  Aslani; Dalia  Dawoud; R. Michael Miller; Lotte Stig Nørgaard

Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research

Shane Desselle, Aleda Chen, Mohamed Amin, Parisa Aslani, Dalia Dawoud, R. Michael Miller, Lotte Stig Nørgaard

Social and Clinical Pharmacy

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.

Original language	Danish
Journal	Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy
ISSN	1934-8150
Publication status	Published - Feb 2020

Cite this

@article{27c4759c6b234322943c9d0384b84cde,

title = "Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research",

abstract = "In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.",

author = "Shane Desselle and Aleda Chen and Mohamed Amin and Parisa Aslani and Dalia Dawoud and Miller, {R. Michael} and N{\o}rgaard, {Lotte Stig}",

note = "Commentary",

year = "2020",

month = feb,

language = "Dansk",

journal = "Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy",

issn = "1551-7411",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generosity, Collegiality, and Scientific Accuracy When Writing and Reviewing Original Research

AU - Desselle, Shane

AU - Chen, Aleda

AU - Amin, Mohamed

AU - Aslani, Parisa

AU - Dawoud, Dalia

AU - Miller, R. Michael

AU - Nørgaard, Lotte Stig

N1 - Commentary

PY - 2020/2

Y1 - 2020/2

N2 - In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.

AB - In spite of concerns about the lack of recognition for its conduct, peer review remains the backbone of scientific evaluation and advancement of scientific knowledge. Given the challenges and evolution in the peer review system, collegiality among authors, reviewers, editors, and even consumers of content is more important than ever. While general guidance has been provided recently in the pharmacy literature, this commentary provides both philosophical underpinnings and specific mechanics for enhancing effectiveness of reviews and improving the quality of writing for authors concurrently, thus examining each major section in an original research contribution. Generosity, courtesy, diligence, thoroughness, and empathy are required of us all to advance the scientific paradigm of our discipline and profession.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SN - 1551-7411

JO - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

JF - Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy

ER -