Gains of integrating sector-wise pollution regulation: the case of nitrogen in Danish crop production and aquaculture

Lars Bo Jacobsen*, Max Nielsen, Rasmus Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work
6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper extends the Orani-G Computable General Equilibrium model with an externality market. The externality market is modelled with a limited number of pollution permits that are traded between representative firms in different sectors. The model is applied to identify the gains of a common nitrogen regulation system for Danish agriculture crop and aquaculture production. Common regulation across the two sectors is found to increase GDP by euro 32 million, corresponding to 2.2% of their initial GDP contribution. The direct effect in the two sectors is euro 39 million, where the spill-over effect is − 7 million. Full use of recirculation technology in aquaculture entails a further increase in GDP to 106 million. The introduction of a common regulatory system and recirculation technology, simultaneous with a reduction of the common nitrogen cap of 17.6%, corresponding to the current policy objectives, is found to increase GDP by 52 million, 4.1% of their initial contribution. Hence, introducing a common regulatory system and taking advantage of the new technology more than counterbalances the negative socio-economic effect of a cap reduction. The analysis points to the importance of introducing more coherent regulatory frameworks that include all polluters under the same regulatory system.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEcological Economics
Volume129
Pages (from-to)172-181
Number of pages10
ISSN0921-8009
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Aquaculture
  • Computable General Equilibrium model
  • Externality market
  • Nitrogen regulation
  • Sector economic costs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Gains of integrating sector-wise pollution regulation: the case of nitrogen in Danish crop production and aquaculture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this