Fundamentals and Optimal Institutions: The case of US sports leagues

    Abstract

    To shed light on the relation between fundamentals and adopted institutions we examine institutional choice across the ``Big Four'' US sports leagues. Despite having very similar business models and facing the same economic and legal environment, these leagues exhibit large differences in their use of regulatory institutions such as revenue sharing, salary caps or luxury taxes. We show, theoretically and empirically, that these large differences in adopted institutions can be rationalized as optimal responses to differences in the fundamental characteristics of the sports being played. This provides a cautionary tail against trying to transplant succesful institutions across different economic settings.
    Original languageEnglish
    Number of pages39
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    SeriesRePEc (Research Papers in Economics)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Fundamentals and Optimal Institutions: The case of US sports leagues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this