From Frankenstein to Toothless Vampire: Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive

Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen; Peter Nedergaard

doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.610692

From Frankenstein to Toothless Vampire: Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive

Mads Christian Dagnis Jensen, Peter Nedergaard

Centre for European Politics

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Services Directive is one of the most significant and controversial legislative proposals ever negotiated in the European Union (EU). This article fills a gap in our knowledge by addressing the key questions as to why and how this prestigious proposal was watered down during the negotiation process. By applying the framework of rational choice institutionalism, the analysis pinpoints the positions of the key players and estimates their relative importance in shaping the final outcome. Prima facie, the European Parliament seemed to be the decisive actor developing the text which was adopted in the end. However, a closer inspection reveals that the text was influenced by the newly elected conservative–socialist coalition government in Germany and reflected a relatively low common denominator which secured acceptance from not only the vast majority of Members of the European Parliament, but also avoided any explicit opposition in the adoption by the Council of Ministers.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of European Public Policy
Volume	19
Issue number	6
Pages (from-to)	844-862
Number of pages	19
ISSN	1350-1763
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.610692
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1080/13501763.2011.610692

Cite this

@article{dca7f51462b345e5888e857bb129fd7b,

title = "From Frankenstein to Toothless Vampire: Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive",

abstract = "The Services Directive is one of the most significant and controversial legislative proposals ever negotiated in the European Union (EU). This article fills a gap in our knowledge by addressing the key questions as to why and how this prestigious proposal was watered down during the negotiation process. By applying the framework of rational choice institutionalism, the analysis pinpoints the positions of the key players and estimates their relative importance in shaping the final outcome. Prima facie, the European Parliament seemed to be the decisive actor developing the text which was adopted in the end. However, a closer inspection reveals that the text was influenced by the newly elected conservative–socialist coalition government in Germany and reflected a relatively low common denominator which secured acceptance from not only the vast majority of Members of the European Parliament, but also avoided any explicit opposition in the adoption by the Council of Ministers.",

author = "Jensen, {Mads Christian Dagnis} and Peter Nedergaard",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1080/13501763.2011.610692",

language = "English",

volume = "19",

pages = "844--862",

journal = "Journal of European Public Policy",

issn = "1350-1763",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Frankenstein to Toothless Vampire

T2 - Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive

AU - Jensen, Mads Christian Dagnis

AU - Nedergaard, Peter

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The Services Directive is one of the most significant and controversial legislative proposals ever negotiated in the European Union (EU). This article fills a gap in our knowledge by addressing the key questions as to why and how this prestigious proposal was watered down during the negotiation process. By applying the framework of rational choice institutionalism, the analysis pinpoints the positions of the key players and estimates their relative importance in shaping the final outcome. Prima facie, the European Parliament seemed to be the decisive actor developing the text which was adopted in the end. However, a closer inspection reveals that the text was influenced by the newly elected conservative–socialist coalition government in Germany and reflected a relatively low common denominator which secured acceptance from not only the vast majority of Members of the European Parliament, but also avoided any explicit opposition in the adoption by the Council of Ministers.

AB - The Services Directive is one of the most significant and controversial legislative proposals ever negotiated in the European Union (EU). This article fills a gap in our knowledge by addressing the key questions as to why and how this prestigious proposal was watered down during the negotiation process. By applying the framework of rational choice institutionalism, the analysis pinpoints the positions of the key players and estimates their relative importance in shaping the final outcome. Prima facie, the European Parliament seemed to be the decisive actor developing the text which was adopted in the end. However, a closer inspection reveals that the text was influenced by the newly elected conservative–socialist coalition government in Germany and reflected a relatively low common denominator which secured acceptance from not only the vast majority of Members of the European Parliament, but also avoided any explicit opposition in the adoption by the Council of Ministers.

U2 - 10.1080/13501763.2011.610692

DO - 10.1080/13501763.2011.610692

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1350-1763

VL - 19

SP - 844

EP - 862

JO - Journal of European Public Policy

JF - Journal of European Public Policy

IS - 6

ER -

From Frankenstein to Toothless Vampire: Explaining the watering down of the Services Directive

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this