Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts

Maurice Gesthuizen; Daniel Kovarek; Carolin Rapp

doi:10.1177/0002716219829016

Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts

Maurice Gesthuizen^*, Daniel Kovarek, Carolin Rapp

^*Corresponding author for this work

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Academic literature emphasizes the importance of work values to job satisfaction and commitment. There is agreement that work values are multidimensional—most often identified as having extrinsic and intrinsic elements. However, little work has gone into assessing the measurement invariance of work values in different contexts. In this contribution, we ask, Do we find similar patterns of extrinsic and intrinsic work values across different cultural contexts? As such, we investigate the validity of work values when they are applied in cross-national analyses by identifying sets of items that can be translated into scales of extrinsic and intrinsic work values that carry a similar meaning in those cultural contexts. We thus want to know which items that make up work values are best understood in diverse contexts and are most suitable for cross-cultural analysis. We tackle this issue by relying on the European Values Study 2008, as well as the CUPESSE data from 2016. The results reveal that there is a trade-off between the number of items researchers use to study work values and the number of countries analyzed if we aim for a more equivalent analysis of work values across Europe.

Original language	English
Journal	Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Volume	682
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	60-83
Number of pages	24
ISSN	0002-7162
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716219829016
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

cross-cultural research
measurement equivalence
scalogram analysis
work values

Access to Document

10.1177/0002716219829016Licence: CC BY-NC

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716219829016Licence: CC BY-NC

Cite this

@article{83538d5320b2459f8a570be92d28b844,

title = "Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts",

abstract = "Academic literature emphasizes the importance of work values to job satisfaction and commitment. There is agreement that work values are multidimensional—most often identified as having extrinsic and intrinsic elements. However, little work has gone into assessing the measurement invariance of work values in different contexts. In this contribution, we ask, Do we find similar patterns of extrinsic and intrinsic work values across different cultural contexts? As such, we investigate the validity of work values when they are applied in cross-national analyses by identifying sets of items that can be translated into scales of extrinsic and intrinsic work values that carry a similar meaning in those cultural contexts. We thus want to know which items that make up work values are best understood in diverse contexts and are most suitable for cross-cultural analysis. We tackle this issue by relying on the European Values Study 2008, as well as the CUPESSE data from 2016. The results reveal that there is a trade-off between the number of items researchers use to study work values and the number of countries analyzed if we aim for a more equivalent analysis of work values across Europe.",

keywords = "cross-cultural research, measurement equivalence, scalogram analysis, work values",

author = "Maurice Gesthuizen and Daniel Kovarek and Carolin Rapp",

year = "2019",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0002716219829016",

language = "English",

volume = "682",

pages = "60--83",

journal = "Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science",

issn = "0002-7162",

publisher = "Sage Journals",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values

T2 - Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts

AU - Gesthuizen, Maurice

AU - Kovarek, Daniel

AU - Rapp, Carolin

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Academic literature emphasizes the importance of work values to job satisfaction and commitment. There is agreement that work values are multidimensional—most often identified as having extrinsic and intrinsic elements. However, little work has gone into assessing the measurement invariance of work values in different contexts. In this contribution, we ask, Do we find similar patterns of extrinsic and intrinsic work values across different cultural contexts? As such, we investigate the validity of work values when they are applied in cross-national analyses by identifying sets of items that can be translated into scales of extrinsic and intrinsic work values that carry a similar meaning in those cultural contexts. We thus want to know which items that make up work values are best understood in diverse contexts and are most suitable for cross-cultural analysis. We tackle this issue by relying on the European Values Study 2008, as well as the CUPESSE data from 2016. The results reveal that there is a trade-off between the number of items researchers use to study work values and the number of countries analyzed if we aim for a more equivalent analysis of work values across Europe.

AB - Academic literature emphasizes the importance of work values to job satisfaction and commitment. There is agreement that work values are multidimensional—most often identified as having extrinsic and intrinsic elements. However, little work has gone into assessing the measurement invariance of work values in different contexts. In this contribution, we ask, Do we find similar patterns of extrinsic and intrinsic work values across different cultural contexts? As such, we investigate the validity of work values when they are applied in cross-national analyses by identifying sets of items that can be translated into scales of extrinsic and intrinsic work values that carry a similar meaning in those cultural contexts. We thus want to know which items that make up work values are best understood in diverse contexts and are most suitable for cross-cultural analysis. We tackle this issue by relying on the European Values Study 2008, as well as the CUPESSE data from 2016. The results reveal that there is a trade-off between the number of items researchers use to study work values and the number of countries analyzed if we aim for a more equivalent analysis of work values across Europe.

KW - cross-cultural research

KW - measurement equivalence

KW - scalogram analysis

KW - work values

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062937688&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002716219829016

DO - 10.1177/0002716219829016

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85062937688

SN - 0002-7162

VL - 682

SP - 60

EP - 83

JO - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

JF - Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

IS - 1

ER -

Extrinsic and Intrinsic Work Values: Findings on Equivalence in Different Cultural Contexts

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this