TY - JOUR
T1 - Exposure to benzodiazepines (anxiolytics, hypnotics and related drugs) in seven European electronic healthcare databases
T2 - a cross-national descriptive study from the PROTECT-EU Project
AU - Huerta, Consuelo
AU - Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria
AU - Requena, Gema
AU - Oliva, Belén
AU - Alvarez, Yolanda
AU - Gardarsdottir, Helga
AU - Miret, Montserrat
AU - Schneider, Cornelia
AU - Gil, Miguel
AU - Souverein, Patrick C
AU - De Bruin, Marie L
AU - Slattery, Jim
AU - De Groot, Mark C H
AU - Hesse, Ulrik
AU - Rottenkolber, Marietta
AU - Schmiedl, Sven
AU - Montero, Dolores
AU - Bate, Andrew
AU - Ruigomez, Ana
AU - García-Rodríguez, Luis Alberto
AU - Johansson, Saga
AU - de Vries, Frank
AU - Schlienger, Raymond G
AU - Reynolds, Robert F
AU - Klungel, Olaf H
AU - de Abajo, Francisco José
N1 - Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
PY - 2016/3/1
Y1 - 2016/3/1
N2 - PURPOSE: Studies on drug utilization usually do not allow direct cross-national comparisons because of differences in the respective applied methods. This study aimed to compare time trends in BZDs prescribing by applying a common protocol and analyses plan in seven European electronic healthcare databases.METHODS: Crude and standardized prevalence rates of drug prescribing from 2001-2009 were calculated in databases from Spain, United Kingdon (UK), The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Prevalence was stratified by age, sex, BZD type [(using ATC codes), i.e. BZD-anxiolytics BZD-hypnotics, BZD-related drugs and clomethiazole], indication and number of prescription.RESULTS: Crude prevalence rates of BZDs prescribing ranged from 570 to 1700 per 10,000 person-years over the study period. Standardization by age and sex did not substantially change the differences. Standardized prevalence rates increased in the Spanish (+13%) and UK databases (+2% and +8%) over the study period, while they decreased in the Dutch databases (-4% and -22%), the German (-12%) and Danish (-26%) database. Prevalence of anxiolytics outweighed that of hypnotics in the Spanish, Dutch and Bavarian databases, but the reverse was shown in the UK and Danish databases. Prevalence rates consistently increased with age and were two-fold higher in women than in men in all databases. A median of 18% of users received 10 or more prescriptions in 2008.CONCLUSION: Although similar methods were applied, the prevalence of BZD prescribing varied considerably across different populations. Clinical factors related to BZDs and characteristics of the databases may explain these differences.
AB - PURPOSE: Studies on drug utilization usually do not allow direct cross-national comparisons because of differences in the respective applied methods. This study aimed to compare time trends in BZDs prescribing by applying a common protocol and analyses plan in seven European electronic healthcare databases.METHODS: Crude and standardized prevalence rates of drug prescribing from 2001-2009 were calculated in databases from Spain, United Kingdon (UK), The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Prevalence was stratified by age, sex, BZD type [(using ATC codes), i.e. BZD-anxiolytics BZD-hypnotics, BZD-related drugs and clomethiazole], indication and number of prescription.RESULTS: Crude prevalence rates of BZDs prescribing ranged from 570 to 1700 per 10,000 person-years over the study period. Standardization by age and sex did not substantially change the differences. Standardized prevalence rates increased in the Spanish (+13%) and UK databases (+2% and +8%) over the study period, while they decreased in the Dutch databases (-4% and -22%), the German (-12%) and Danish (-26%) database. Prevalence of anxiolytics outweighed that of hypnotics in the Spanish, Dutch and Bavarian databases, but the reverse was shown in the UK and Danish databases. Prevalence rates consistently increased with age and were two-fold higher in women than in men in all databases. A median of 18% of users received 10 or more prescriptions in 2008.CONCLUSION: Although similar methods were applied, the prevalence of BZD prescribing varied considerably across different populations. Clinical factors related to BZDs and characteristics of the databases may explain these differences.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1002/pds.3825
DO - 10.1002/pds.3825
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26149383
SN - 1053-8569
VL - 25 Suppl 1
SP - 56
EP - 65
JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
ER -