Exercise on prescription: a randomized study on the effect of counseling vs counseling and supervised exercise

J. Kragstrup, T. Skovgaard, L. Puggaard, Jens Benn Sørensen

    39 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to compare short- (0-4 months) and long-term (0-10 months) effects of high-intensive Exercise on Prescription (EoP) intervention (counseling and supervised exercise) implemented in primary healthcare in a number of Danish counties with a low-intensive intervention (counseling) using maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) as the primary outcome. The study was conducted as a randomized trial in 2005-2006 with a high and a low-intensive group. All the patients referred to the EoP scheme by their GP in the counties of Vejle and Ribe, Denmark, were eligible for the trial. The high-intensive EoP group received 4 months of group-based supervised training and attended five motivational counseling sessions. The low-intensive group only attended four motivational counseling sessions. Three hundred and twenty-seven patients entered the EoP scheme, and 52 (16%) volunteered for the randomized trial. No short- or long-term differences were found between the high and the low-intensive groups for VO(2max) (short-term 95% CI -1.1; 4.4 mL O(2)/(kg min), long-term 95% CI -1.6 to 2.1). The present study did not demonstrate any significant clinical outcome for the high-intensive EoP intervention as opposed to the low-intensive intervention
    Udgivelsesdato: 2008/6
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
    Volume18
    Issue number3
    Pages (from-to)288-297
    Number of pages9
    ISSN0905-7188
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Cite this