Evaluation of MIC Strip Isavuconazole test for susceptibility testing of wild-type and non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates

Maiken Cavling Arendrup*, Paul Verweij, Henrik Vedel Nielsen

*Corresponding author for this work
13 Citations (Scopus)
64 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We evaluated the MIC Strip Isavuconazole test against EUCAST E.Def 9.3 by using 40 wild-type and 39 CYP51A mutant Aspergillus fumigatus strains. The strip full inhibition endpoint (FIE) and 80% growth inhibition endpoint were determined by two independent readers, reader 1 (R1) and R2. The essential (within ±0, ±1, and ±2 twofold dilutions) and categorical agreements were best with the FIE (for R1/R2, 42%/41%, 75%/73%, and 90%/89% for essential agreement, and 91.1%/92.4% categorical agreement, with 6.3/8.9% very major errors and 0/1.3% major errors, respectively). The MIC Strip Isavuconazole test with the FIE appears to be useful.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere01659-16
JournalAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Volume61
Issue number1
Number of pages5
ISSN0066-4804
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Antifungal susceptibility testing
  • Aspergillus fumigatus
  • Cyp51A mutants
  • EUCAST
  • Gradient strip
  • Isavuconazole
  • MIC
  • Wild type

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of MIC Strip Isavuconazole test for susceptibility testing of wild-type and non-wild-type Aspergillus fumigatus isolates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this