Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

Kasper Hoffmann

doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

Section for Global Development

Abstract

In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.

Original language	English
Journal	Geoforum
ISSN	0016-7185
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002
Publication status	Published - Feb 2021

Access to Document

10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

Cite this

@article{3ac4924d3b5d482d944bb43ad165dc68,

title = "Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo",

abstract = "In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people{\textquoteright}s sense of self and on struggles over political space.",

author = "Kasper Hoffmann",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002",

language = "English",

journal = "Geoforum",

issn = "0016-7185",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnogovernmentality

T2 - The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

AU - Hoffmann, Kasper

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.

AB - In this article I investigate colonial constructions of ethnicity and territory and their effects in the post-independence period in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. The core argument of the article is that the constructions of ethnicity and territory that are set in motion in struggles over political space in the Congolese conflicts are conditioned by what I call “ethnogovernmentality”, which denotes a heterogeneous ensemble of biopolitical and territorial rationalities and practices of power concerned with the conduct of conduct of ethnic populations. Through ethnogovernmentality colonial authorities sought to impose ordered scientific visions of ethnicity, custom, culture, space, territory, and geography, upon ambivalent cultures and spaces. I show that while ethnogovernmentality failed to produce the stability and order the colonial authorities sought, its ethno-territorial regime of truth and practice has had durable effects on people’s sense of self and on struggles over political space.

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.10.002

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0016-7185

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

ER -

Ethnogovernmentality: The making of ethnic territories and subjects in eastern DR Congo

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this