Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: paralleling the WTO?

Carsten Daugbjerg; Linda Courtenay Botterill

doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: paralleling the WTO?

Carsten Daugbjerg, Linda Courtenay Botterill

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food.

Original language	English
Journal	Policy and Society
Volume	31
Issue number	4
Pages (from-to)	307-317
Number of pages	11
ISSN	1449-4035
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003
Publication status	Published - Nov 2012

Access to Document

10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

Cite this

@article{a7afd519dd414593b3d68ffdb85798cb,

title = "Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: paralleling the WTO?",

abstract = "Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food.",

author = "Carsten Daugbjerg and Botterill, {Linda Courtenay}",

note = "Policy analysis and the new politics of food and agriculture",

year = "2012",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "307--317",

journal = "Policy and Society",

issn = "1449-4035",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical food standard schemes and global trade

T2 - paralleling the WTO?

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

AU - Botterill, Linda Courtenay

N1 - Policy analysis and the new politics of food and agriculture

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food.

AB - Global food trade embodies a range of different interpretations of the nature of food and its role in society. On the one hand, the WTO food regulation regime, in particular the SPS agreement, is based upon a somewhat instrumental value of food consumption in which food is seen as a commodity to be traded in accordance with international trade rules. At the same time, a number of private standards, such as GlobalG.A.P and various organic standards, are emerging which embody broadly postmaterialist values that suggest that food purchasing and consumption are also social, ethical and perhaps even political activities. This paper analyses the relationship between the WTO food trade regime on the one hand and the GlobalG.A.P and organic food trade regimes on the other. We suggest that competing values can co-exist in parallel institutions and in a commensalistic relationship which protects the values base of each institution while giving expression to both materialist and postmaterialist understandings of the nature of food.

U2 - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.polsoc.2012.09.003

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1449-4035

VL - 31

SP - 307

EP - 317

JO - Policy and Society

JF - Policy and Society

IS - 4

ER -

Ethical food standard schemes and global trade: paralleling the WTO?

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this