Epithelial entry rather than the ensuing systemic immune response determines the pathogenicity of two Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains in a mouse model

Rikke Brandt Sørensen, Anne Petersen, Susanne Brix Pedersen, Tine Rask Licht, Hanne Frøkiær

    7 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Most studies of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection focus only on the pathogenicity of one strain. We investigated whether differences in pathogenicity of two wild-type S. Typhimurium strains; DT120 and SL1344, were related to gut invasion or the resulting immune response.Oral administration of a ten-fold lower number of SL1344 (106CFU) as compared to DT120 (107CFU) resulted in higher bacterial counts in liver and lymph nodes, and led to massive neutrophil infiltration of the spleen, while DT120 administration did not. In contrast, administration of the same dose (103CFU) of the two strains intravenously resulted in the same levels of bacteria and neutrophils in spleen and bone marrow. Oral administration of SL1344 led to an increase in neutrophil apoptosis in both spleen and the bone marrow and four out of five mice died before Day 8, while in DT120 mice, no increase in neutrophil apoptosis was observed and all mice survived until Day 8. This study reveals that two wild-type S. Typhimurium strains, despite evoking highly comparable immune responses upon intravenous injection, exhibit diverse pathogenicity in mice and thus suggests that differences in their invasiveness and survival during gut passage determines the success of the ensuing immune response.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalMicrobes and Infection
    Volume15
    Issue number13
    Pages (from-to)911-919
    Number of pages9
    ISSN1286-4579
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Epithelial entry rather than the ensuing systemic immune response determines the pathogenicity of two Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains in a mouse model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this