Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial

Christian L Carranza; Martin Ballegaard; Mads U Werner; Philip Hasbak; Andreas Kjær; Klaus F Kofoed; Jane Lindschou; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Peter Skov Olsen; Daniel A Steinbrüchel

doi:10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial

Christian L Carranza, Martin Ballegaard, Mads U Werner, Philip Hasbak, Andreas Kjær, Klaus F Kofoed, Jane Lindschou, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Christian Gluud, Peter Skov Olsen, Daniel A Steinbrüchel

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery has, since the 1990s, gone through a revival. Observational studies have indicated better long-term patency when using radial arteries. Therefore, radial artery might be preferred especially in younger patients where long time patency is important. During the last 10 years different endoscopic techniques to harvest the radial artery have evolved. Endoscopic radial artery harvest only requires a small incision near the wrist in contrast to open harvest, which requires an incision from the elbow to the wrist. However, it is unknown whether the endoscopic technique results in fewer complications or a graft patency comparable to open harvest. When the radial artery has been harvested, there are two ways to use the radial artery as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another is sewing it onto the mammary artery. It is unknown which technique is the superior revascularisation technique.

METHODS/DESIGN: The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endoscopic group; (2) aorto-radial endoscopic group; (3) mammario-radial open surgery group; and (4) aorto-radial open surgery group.The hand function will be assessed by a questionnaire, a clinical examination, the change in cutaneous sensibility, and the measurement of both sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity at 3 months postoperatively. All the postoperative complications will be registered, and we will evaluate muscular function, scar appearance, vascular supply to the hand, and the graft patency including the patency of the central radial artery anastomosis. A patency evaluation by multi-slice computer tomography will be done at one year postoperatively.We expect the nerve conduction studies and the standardised neurological examinations to be able to discriminate differences in hand function comparing endoscopic to open harvest of the radial artery. The trial also aims to show if there is any patency difference between mammario-radial compared to aorto-radial revascularisation techniques but this objective is exploratory.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848886.Danish Ethics committee number: H-3-2012-116.Danish Data Protection Agency: 2007-58-0015/jr.n:30-0838.

Original language	English
Article number	135
Journal	Trials
Volume	15
Pages (from-to)	1-18
Number of pages	18
ISSN	1745-6215
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-135
Publication status	Published - 23 Apr 2014

Keywords

Aorta
Aortography
Clinical Protocols
Coronary Artery Bypass
Denmark
Endoscopy
Female
Graft Occlusion, Vascular
Hand Injuries
Humans
Male
Mammary Arteries
Multidetector Computed Tomography
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative
Predictive Value of Tests
Questionnaires
Radial Artery
Research Design
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency

Access to Document

10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Carranza, C. L., Ballegaard, M., Werner, M. U., Hasbak, P., Kjær, A., Kofoed, K. F., Lindschou, J., Jakobsen, J. C., Gluud, C., Olsen, P. S., & Steinbrüchel, D. A. (2014). Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial . Trials, 15, 1-18. [135]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery : protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial . / Carranza, Christian L; Ballegaard, Martin; Werner, Mads U et al.

In: Trials, Vol. 15, 135, 23.04.2014, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Carranza, CL, Ballegaard, M, Werner, MU, Hasbak, P, Kjær, A, Kofoed, KF, Lindschou, J, Jakobsen, JC, Gluud, C, Olsen, PS & Steinbrüchel, DA 2014, 'Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial ', Trials, vol. 15, 135, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

@article{fba9add66b7846bb810e113b5d369d6e,

title = "Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial ",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery has, since the 1990s, gone through a revival. Observational studies have indicated better long-term patency when using radial arteries. Therefore, radial artery might be preferred especially in younger patients where long time patency is important. During the last 10 years different endoscopic techniques to harvest the radial artery have evolved. Endoscopic radial artery harvest only requires a small incision near the wrist in contrast to open harvest, which requires an incision from the elbow to the wrist. However, it is unknown whether the endoscopic technique results in fewer complications or a graft patency comparable to open harvest. When the radial artery has been harvested, there are two ways to use the radial artery as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another is sewing it onto the mammary artery. It is unknown which technique is the superior revascularisation technique.METHODS/DESIGN: The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endoscopic group; (2) aorto-radial endoscopic group; (3) mammario-radial open surgery group; and (4) aorto-radial open surgery group.The hand function will be assessed by a questionnaire, a clinical examination, the change in cutaneous sensibility, and the measurement of both sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity at 3 months postoperatively. All the postoperative complications will be registered, and we will evaluate muscular function, scar appearance, vascular supply to the hand, and the graft patency including the patency of the central radial artery anastomosis. A patency evaluation by multi-slice computer tomography will be done at one year postoperatively.We expect the nerve conduction studies and the standardised neurological examinations to be able to discriminate differences in hand function comparing endoscopic to open harvest of the radial artery. The trial also aims to show if there is any patency difference between mammario-radial compared to aorto-radial revascularisation techniques but this objective is exploratory.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848886.Danish Ethics committee number: H-3-2012-116.Danish Data Protection Agency: 2007-58-0015/jr.n:30-0838.",

keywords = "Aorta, Aortography, Clinical Protocols, Coronary Artery Bypass, Denmark, Endoscopy, Female, Graft Occlusion, Vascular, Hand Injuries, Humans, Male, Mammary Arteries, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Predictive Value of Tests, Questionnaires, Radial Artery, Research Design, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tissue and Organ Harvesting, Treatment Outcome, Vascular Patency",

author = "Carranza, {Christian L} and Martin Ballegaard and Werner, {Mads U} and Philip Hasbak and Andreas Kj{\ae}r and Kofoed, {Klaus F} and Jane Lindschou and Jakobsen, {Janus Christian} and Christian Gluud and Olsen, {Peter Skov} and Steinbr{\"u}chel, {Daniel A}",

year = "2014",

month = apr,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-15-135",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

pages = "1--18",

journal = "Trials",

issn = "1745-6215",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvest and mammario-radial versus aorto-radial grafting in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

T2 - protocol for the 2 × 2 factorial designed randomised NEO trial

AU - Carranza, Christian L

AU - Ballegaard, Martin

AU - Werner, Mads U

AU - Hasbak, Philip

AU - Kjær, Andreas

AU - Kofoed, Klaus F

AU - Lindschou, Jane

AU - Jakobsen, Janus Christian

AU - Gluud, Christian

AU - Olsen, Peter Skov

AU - Steinbrüchel, Daniel A

PY - 2014/4/23

Y1 - 2014/4/23

N2 - BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery has, since the 1990s, gone through a revival. Observational studies have indicated better long-term patency when using radial arteries. Therefore, radial artery might be preferred especially in younger patients where long time patency is important. During the last 10 years different endoscopic techniques to harvest the radial artery have evolved. Endoscopic radial artery harvest only requires a small incision near the wrist in contrast to open harvest, which requires an incision from the elbow to the wrist. However, it is unknown whether the endoscopic technique results in fewer complications or a graft patency comparable to open harvest. When the radial artery has been harvested, there are two ways to use the radial artery as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another is sewing it onto the mammary artery. It is unknown which technique is the superior revascularisation technique.METHODS/DESIGN: The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endoscopic group; (2) aorto-radial endoscopic group; (3) mammario-radial open surgery group; and (4) aorto-radial open surgery group.The hand function will be assessed by a questionnaire, a clinical examination, the change in cutaneous sensibility, and the measurement of both sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity at 3 months postoperatively. All the postoperative complications will be registered, and we will evaluate muscular function, scar appearance, vascular supply to the hand, and the graft patency including the patency of the central radial artery anastomosis. A patency evaluation by multi-slice computer tomography will be done at one year postoperatively.We expect the nerve conduction studies and the standardised neurological examinations to be able to discriminate differences in hand function comparing endoscopic to open harvest of the radial artery. The trial also aims to show if there is any patency difference between mammario-radial compared to aorto-radial revascularisation techniques but this objective is exploratory.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848886.Danish Ethics committee number: H-3-2012-116.Danish Data Protection Agency: 2007-58-0015/jr.n:30-0838.

AB - BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery has, since the 1990s, gone through a revival. Observational studies have indicated better long-term patency when using radial arteries. Therefore, radial artery might be preferred especially in younger patients where long time patency is important. During the last 10 years different endoscopic techniques to harvest the radial artery have evolved. Endoscopic radial artery harvest only requires a small incision near the wrist in contrast to open harvest, which requires an incision from the elbow to the wrist. However, it is unknown whether the endoscopic technique results in fewer complications or a graft patency comparable to open harvest. When the radial artery has been harvested, there are two ways to use the radial artery as a graft. One way is sewing it onto the aorta and another is sewing it onto the mammary artery. It is unknown which technique is the superior revascularisation technique.METHODS/DESIGN: The NEO Trial is a randomised clinical trial with a 2 × 2 factorial design. We plan to randomise 300 participants into four intervention groups: (1) mammario-radial endoscopic group; (2) aorto-radial endoscopic group; (3) mammario-radial open surgery group; and (4) aorto-radial open surgery group.The hand function will be assessed by a questionnaire, a clinical examination, the change in cutaneous sensibility, and the measurement of both sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity at 3 months postoperatively. All the postoperative complications will be registered, and we will evaluate muscular function, scar appearance, vascular supply to the hand, and the graft patency including the patency of the central radial artery anastomosis. A patency evaluation by multi-slice computer tomography will be done at one year postoperatively.We expect the nerve conduction studies and the standardised neurological examinations to be able to discriminate differences in hand function comparing endoscopic to open harvest of the radial artery. The trial also aims to show if there is any patency difference between mammario-radial compared to aorto-radial revascularisation techniques but this objective is exploratory.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01848886.Danish Ethics committee number: H-3-2012-116.Danish Data Protection Agency: 2007-58-0015/jr.n:30-0838.

KW - Aorta

KW - Aortography

KW - Clinical Protocols

KW - Coronary Artery Bypass

KW - Denmark

KW - Endoscopy

KW - Female

KW - Graft Occlusion, Vascular

KW - Hand Injuries

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Mammary Arteries

KW - Multidetector Computed Tomography

KW - Pain Measurement

KW - Pain, Postoperative

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Radial Artery

KW - Research Design

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Time Factors

KW - Tissue and Organ Harvesting

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Vascular Patency

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-15-135

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24754891

SN - 1745-6215

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

M1 - 135

ER -