Effects of aging on muscle mechanical function and muscle fiber morphology during short-term immobilization and subsequent retraining

Lars Hvid, Per Aagaard, Lene Justesen, Monika L Bayer, Jesper L Andersen, Niels Ørtenblad, Michael Kjaer, Charlotte Suetta

110 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Very little attention has been given to the combined effects of aging and disuse as separate factors causing deterioration in muscle mechanical function. Thus the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of 2 wk of immobilization followed by 4 wk of retraining on knee extensor muscle mechanical function (e.g., maximal strength and rapid force capacity) and muscle fiber morphology in 9 old (OM: 67.3 ±1.3 yr) and 11 young healthy men (YM: 24.4 ± 0.5 yr) with comparable levels of physical activity. Following immobilization, OM demonstrated markedly larger decreases in rapid force capacity (i.e., rate of force development, impulse) than YM (∼20-37 vs. ∼13-16%; P < 0.05). In contrast, muscle fiber area decreased in YM for type I, IIA, and IIx fibers (∼ 15-30%; P < 0.05), whereas only type IIa area decreased in OM (13.2%; P < 0.05). Subsequent retraining fully restored muscle mechanical function and muscle fiber area in YM, whereas OM showed an attenuated recovery in muscle fiber area and rapid force capacity (tendency). Changes in maximal isometric and dynamic muscle strength were similar between OM and YM. In conclusion, the present data reveal that OM may be more susceptible to the deleterious effects of short-term muscle disuse on muscle fiber size and rapid force capacity than YM. Furthermore, OM seems to require longer time to recover and regain rapid muscle force capacity, which may lead to a larger risk of falling in aged individuals after periods of short-term disuse.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
Volume109
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1628-34
Number of pages7
ISSN8750-7587
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of aging on muscle mechanical function and muscle fiber morphology during short-term immobilization and subsequent retraining'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this