Effect of portion size and milk flow on the use of a milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves

Per Peetz Nielsen; Margit Bak Jensen; Ulrich Halekoh; Lena Lidfors

doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012

Effect of portion size and milk flow on the use of a milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves

Per Peetz Nielsen^*, Margit Bak Jensen, Ulrich Halekoh, Lena Lidfors

^*Corresponding author for this work

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate whether reducing the milk flow and increasing the milk portion size of a computer-controlled milk feeder would lead to less cross-sucking and fewer unrewarded feeder visits in dairy calves. Five groups, each with 9 or 10 calves (n = 48), were housed in pens with one milk feeder in each pen, and exposed to four milk-feeding treatments in a cross-over design with four periods of 1 week. All four treatments involved a daily allowance of 8. L of whole milk, with variation in the maximum portion size and the rate at which milk entered the teat of the milk feeder. The treatments were: 1) 1. L/Low flow (1. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 2) 2. l/Low flow (2. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 3) 1. l/High flow (1. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min); 4) 2. l/High flow (2. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min). When the calves were fed milk in 2. l portions, they had fewer rewarded visits (P. <. 0.001) than when they were fed 1. l portions. When the calves were fed the milk in 2. l portions with a low flow, they spent more time on rewarded visits during which they did not ingest the whole portion (P. <. 0.05) and had more (P. <. 0.001) and longer (P. <. 0.001) rewarded visits during which they ingested less than 0.5. l of the portion. The treatments had no effect on the occurrence of cross-sucking. A higher number of bull calves were subject to cross-sucking than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001), and in total they also received more cross-sucking events than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001). Heifer calves initiated a higher frequency of cross-sucking than bull calves (P. <. 0.001). We concluded that when calves are given milk in 2. l portions, a very low flow should be avoided, as this may reduce the calves' milk intake. The finding that bull calves were subject to cross-sucking more often than heifers, while heifer calves initiated more cross-sucking than bulls warrants further studies on these gender effects.

Original language	English
Journal	Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Volume	200
Pages (from-to)	23-28
ISSN	0168-1591
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012
Publication status	Published - Mar 2018

Keywords

Automatic milk feeder
Calves
Cross-sucking
Milk allowance
Milk flow

Access to Document

10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012

Cite this

@article{12de804dfd7f4da1b8c676f93696ca12,

title = "Effect of portion size and milk flow on the use of a milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves",

abstract = "This study aimed to investigate whether reducing the milk flow and increasing the milk portion size of a computer-controlled milk feeder would lead to less cross-sucking and fewer unrewarded feeder visits in dairy calves. Five groups, each with 9 or 10 calves (n = 48), were housed in pens with one milk feeder in each pen, and exposed to four milk-feeding treatments in a cross-over design with four periods of 1 week. All four treatments involved a daily allowance of 8. L of whole milk, with variation in the maximum portion size and the rate at which milk entered the teat of the milk feeder. The treatments were: 1) 1. L/Low flow (1. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 2) 2. l/Low flow (2. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 3) 1. l/High flow (1. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min); 4) 2. l/High flow (2. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min). When the calves were fed milk in 2. l portions, they had fewer rewarded visits (P. <. 0.001) than when they were fed 1. l portions. When the calves were fed the milk in 2. l portions with a low flow, they spent more time on rewarded visits during which they did not ingest the whole portion (P. <. 0.05) and had more (P. <. 0.001) and longer (P. <. 0.001) rewarded visits during which they ingested less than 0.5. l of the portion. The treatments had no effect on the occurrence of cross-sucking. A higher number of bull calves were subject to cross-sucking than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001), and in total they also received more cross-sucking events than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001). Heifer calves initiated a higher frequency of cross-sucking than bull calves (P. <. 0.001). We concluded that when calves are given milk in 2. l portions, a very low flow should be avoided, as this may reduce the calves' milk intake. The finding that bull calves were subject to cross-sucking more often than heifers, while heifer calves initiated more cross-sucking than bulls warrants further studies on these gender effects.",

keywords = "Automatic milk feeder, Calves, Cross-sucking, Milk allowance, Milk flow",

author = "Nielsen, {Per Peetz} and Jensen, {Margit Bak} and Ulrich Halekoh and Lena Lidfors",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012",

language = "English",

volume = "200",

pages = "23--28",

journal = "Applied Animal Behaviour Science",

issn = "0168-1591",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of portion size and milk flow on the use of a milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves

AU - Nielsen, Per Peetz

AU - Jensen, Margit Bak

AU - Halekoh, Ulrich

AU - Lidfors, Lena

PY - 2018/3

Y1 - 2018/3

N2 - This study aimed to investigate whether reducing the milk flow and increasing the milk portion size of a computer-controlled milk feeder would lead to less cross-sucking and fewer unrewarded feeder visits in dairy calves. Five groups, each with 9 or 10 calves (n = 48), were housed in pens with one milk feeder in each pen, and exposed to four milk-feeding treatments in a cross-over design with four periods of 1 week. All four treatments involved a daily allowance of 8. L of whole milk, with variation in the maximum portion size and the rate at which milk entered the teat of the milk feeder. The treatments were: 1) 1. L/Low flow (1. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 2) 2. l/Low flow (2. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 3) 1. l/High flow (1. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min); 4) 2. l/High flow (2. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min). When the calves were fed milk in 2. l portions, they had fewer rewarded visits (P. <. 0.001) than when they were fed 1. l portions. When the calves were fed the milk in 2. l portions with a low flow, they spent more time on rewarded visits during which they did not ingest the whole portion (P. <. 0.05) and had more (P. <. 0.001) and longer (P. <. 0.001) rewarded visits during which they ingested less than 0.5. l of the portion. The treatments had no effect on the occurrence of cross-sucking. A higher number of bull calves were subject to cross-sucking than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001), and in total they also received more cross-sucking events than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001). Heifer calves initiated a higher frequency of cross-sucking than bull calves (P. <. 0.001). We concluded that when calves are given milk in 2. l portions, a very low flow should be avoided, as this may reduce the calves' milk intake. The finding that bull calves were subject to cross-sucking more often than heifers, while heifer calves initiated more cross-sucking than bulls warrants further studies on these gender effects.

AB - This study aimed to investigate whether reducing the milk flow and increasing the milk portion size of a computer-controlled milk feeder would lead to less cross-sucking and fewer unrewarded feeder visits in dairy calves. Five groups, each with 9 or 10 calves (n = 48), were housed in pens with one milk feeder in each pen, and exposed to four milk-feeding treatments in a cross-over design with four periods of 1 week. All four treatments involved a daily allowance of 8. L of whole milk, with variation in the maximum portion size and the rate at which milk entered the teat of the milk feeder. The treatments were: 1) 1. L/Low flow (1. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 2) 2. l/Low flow (2. l portions at a flow of 300. ml/min); 3) 1. l/High flow (1. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min); 4) 2. l/High flow (2. l portions at a flow of 600. ml/min). When the calves were fed milk in 2. l portions, they had fewer rewarded visits (P. <. 0.001) than when they were fed 1. l portions. When the calves were fed the milk in 2. l portions with a low flow, they spent more time on rewarded visits during which they did not ingest the whole portion (P. <. 0.05) and had more (P. <. 0.001) and longer (P. <. 0.001) rewarded visits during which they ingested less than 0.5. l of the portion. The treatments had no effect on the occurrence of cross-sucking. A higher number of bull calves were subject to cross-sucking than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001), and in total they also received more cross-sucking events than heifer calves (P. <. 0.001). Heifer calves initiated a higher frequency of cross-sucking than bull calves (P. <. 0.001). We concluded that when calves are given milk in 2. l portions, a very low flow should be avoided, as this may reduce the calves' milk intake. The finding that bull calves were subject to cross-sucking more often than heifers, while heifer calves initiated more cross-sucking than bulls warrants further studies on these gender effects.

KW - Automatic milk feeder

KW - Calves

KW - Cross-sucking

KW - Milk allowance

KW - Milk flow

U2 - 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012

DO - 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.11.012

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85037049989

SN - 0168-1591

VL - 200

SP - 23

EP - 28

JO - Applied Animal Behaviour Science

JF - Applied Animal Behaviour Science

ER -

Effect of portion size and milk flow on the use of a milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this