Effect of high-intensity training versus moderate training on peak oxygen uptake and chronotropic response in heart transplant recipients: a randomized crossover trial

C H Dall, M Snoer, S Christensen, T Monk-Hansen, M Frederiksen, F Gustafsson, Henning Langberg, E Prescott

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In heart transplant (HTx) recipients, there has been reluctance to recommend high-intensity interval training (HIIT) due to denervation and chronotropic impairment of the heart. We compared the effects of 12 weeks' HIIT versus continued moderate exercise (CON) on exercise capacity and chronotropic response in stable HTx recipients >12 months after transplantation in a randomized crossover trial. The study was completed by 16 HTx recipients (mean age 52 years, 75% males). Baseline peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) was 22.9mL/kg/min. HIIT increased VO2peak by 4.9±2.7mL/min/kg (17%) and CON by 2.6±2.2mL/kg/min (10%) (significantly higher in HIIT; p<0.001). During HIIT, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (p=0.037) with no significant change in CON (p=0.241; between group difference p=0.027). Peak heart rate (HRpeak) increased significantly by 4.3beats per minute (p=0.014) after HIIT with no significant change in CON (p=0.34; between group difference p=0.027). Heart rate recovery (HRrecovery) improved in both groups with a trend toward greater improvement after HIIT. The 5-month washout showed a significant loss of improvement. HIIT was well tolerated, had a superior effect on oxygen uptake, and led to an unexpected increase in HRpeak accompanied by a faster HRrecovery. This indicates that the benefits of HIIT are partly a result of improved chronotropic response.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Transplantation
Volume14
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)2391-9
Number of pages9
ISSN1600-6135
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of high-intensity training versus moderate training on peak oxygen uptake and chronotropic response in heart transplant recipients: a randomized crossover trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this