Effect of fluoride and chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinses on plaque biofilms

Per Rabe, Svante Twetman, Bertil Kinnby, Gunnel Svensäter, Julia R Davies

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To develop a model in which to investigate the architecture of plaque biofilms formed on enamel surfaces in vivo and to compare the effects of anti-microbial agents of relevance for caries on biofilm vitality. Materials and Methodology: Enamel discs mounted on healing abutments in the pre-molar region were worn by three subjects for 7 days. Control discs were removed before subjects rinsed with 0.1% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) or 0.2% sodium fluoride (NaF) for 1 minute. Biofilms were stained with Baclight Live/Dead and z-stacks of images created using confocal scanning laser micoscopy. The levels of vital and dead/damaged bacteria in the biofilms, assessed as the proportion of green and red pixels respectively, were analysed using ImageTrak® software. Results: The subjects showed individual differences in biofilm architecture. The thickness of the biofilms varied from 28-96&1048577;m although cell density was always the greatest in the middle layers. In control biofilms, the overall levels of vitality were high (71-98%) especially in the area closest to the enamel interface. Rinsing with either CHX or NaF caused a similar reduction in overall vitality. CHX exerted an effect throughout the biofilm, particularly on the surface of cell clusters whereas NaF caused cell damage/death mainly in the middle to lower biofilm layers. Conclusion: We describe a model that allows the formation of mature, undisturbed oral biofilms on human enamel surfaces in vivo and show that CHX and NaF have a similar effect on overall vitality but differ in their sites of action.

Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Open Dentistry Journal
Volume9
Pages (from-to)106-11
Number of pages6
ISSN1874-2106
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of fluoride and chlorhexidine digluconate mouthrinses on plaque biofilms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this