East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified reality?

    21 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The paper asks if East Asian welfare regimes are still productivist and Confucian? And, have they developed public care policies? The literature is split on the first question but (mostly) confirmative on the second. Care has to a large, but insufficient extent, been rolled out in the region. Political science studies tend to conclude that the region has left the old legacies behind and are now welfare states comparable to European states including them either in the conservative type (e.g. Japan), the liberal type (e.g. Korea) or even as a tendency in the Nordic type (e.g. China), while studies focusing on outcomes or causal links tend to suggest that legacies prevail, but there is (nearly) consensus that Confucianism exercises great influence in the whole region.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Asian Public Policy
    Volume10
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)90-103
    ISSN1751-6234
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2 Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Faculty of Social Sciences
    • East Asia
    • welfare regime
    • social policy
    • family policy
    • confucianism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'East Asian welfare regime: obsolete ideal-type or diversified reality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this