Does the Primary Imaging Modality-Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Influence Stroke Physicians' Certainty on Whether or Not to Give Thrombolysis to Randomized Acute Stroke Patients?

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does the Primary Imaging Modality-Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Influence Stroke Physicians' Certainty on Whether or Not to Give Thrombolysis to Randomized Acute Stroke Patients?

AU - Hansen, Christine Krarup

AU - Christensen, Anders

AU - Rodgers, Helen

AU - Havsteen, Inger

AU - Kruuse, Christina

AU - Christensen, Hanne

N1 - Copyright © 2018 National Stroke Association. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/4

Y1 - 2018/4

N2 - BACKGROUND: Door-to-needle time of 20 minutes to stroke patients with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (iv-tPA) is feasible when computed tomography (CT) is used as first-line of brain imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based assessment is more time-consuming but superior in detecting acute ischemia. The certainty with which stroke physicians prescribe or refrain from giving iv-tPA treatment to CT- versus MRI-examined patients has not previously been studied. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a primary imaging strategy of CT or MRI on clinicians' certainty to prescribe or refrain from giving iv-tPA to patients with suspected acute stroke.METHOD: Consecutive patients with suspected stroke were quasi-randomized to either CT- or MRI-based assessment before potential iv-tPA treatment. The influence of (1) the clinical findings and (2) the image findings, and (3) the certainty with which the stroke physician prescribed or refrained from giving iv-tPA treatment were assessed with visual analog scales (VAS). Predictors of treatment certainty were identified with a random-effect model.RESULTS: Four-hundred forty-four consecutive patients were quasi-randomized. MRI influenced the final treatment decision more than CT (P = .002). Compared with CT-examined patients (mean VAS score 8.6, SD ±1.6) stroke physicians were significantly more certain when prescribing or refraining from giving iv-tPA to MRI-examined patients (mean VAS score 9.0, SD ±1.2) (P = .014). No differences in modified Rankin scale or mortality were detected at 3 months in CT- versus MRI-examined iv-tPA-treated patients.CONCLUSIONS: Stroke physicians were significantly more certain when prescribing iv-tPA to MRI-examined stroke patients, and MRI influences the final treatment decision significantly more compared with CT, although no difference in mortality and functional outcome at 3 months was detected between CT- and MRI-examined patients treated with iv-tPA.

AB - BACKGROUND: Door-to-needle time of 20 minutes to stroke patients with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (iv-tPA) is feasible when computed tomography (CT) is used as first-line of brain imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based assessment is more time-consuming but superior in detecting acute ischemia. The certainty with which stroke physicians prescribe or refrain from giving iv-tPA treatment to CT- versus MRI-examined patients has not previously been studied. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of a primary imaging strategy of CT or MRI on clinicians' certainty to prescribe or refrain from giving iv-tPA to patients with suspected acute stroke.METHOD: Consecutive patients with suspected stroke were quasi-randomized to either CT- or MRI-based assessment before potential iv-tPA treatment. The influence of (1) the clinical findings and (2) the image findings, and (3) the certainty with which the stroke physician prescribed or refrained from giving iv-tPA treatment were assessed with visual analog scales (VAS). Predictors of treatment certainty were identified with a random-effect model.RESULTS: Four-hundred forty-four consecutive patients were quasi-randomized. MRI influenced the final treatment decision more than CT (P = .002). Compared with CT-examined patients (mean VAS score 8.6, SD ±1.6) stroke physicians were significantly more certain when prescribing or refraining from giving iv-tPA to MRI-examined patients (mean VAS score 9.0, SD ±1.2) (P = .014). No differences in modified Rankin scale or mortality were detected at 3 months in CT- versus MRI-examined iv-tPA-treated patients.CONCLUSIONS: Stroke physicians were significantly more certain when prescribing iv-tPA to MRI-examined stroke patients, and MRI influences the final treatment decision significantly more compared with CT, although no difference in mortality and functional outcome at 3 months was detected between CT- and MRI-examined patients treated with iv-tPA.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.035

DO - 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.10.035

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29198901

SN - 1052-3057

VL - 27

SP - 926

EP - 935

JO - Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases

JF - Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases

IS - 4

ER -