Abstract
Introduction We aimed to assess the value of a second MR scan in the radiological diagnosis of dementia. Methods One hundred twenty subjects with clinical followup of at least 1 year with two scans were selected from a cognitive disorders clinic. Scans were reviewed as a single first scan (method A), two unregistered scans presented sideby- side (method B) and a registered pair (method C). Scans were presented to two neuroradiologists and a clinician together with approximate scan interval (if applicable) and age. Raters decided on a main and subtype diagnosis. Results There was no evidence that differences between methods (expressed as relative odds of a correct response) differed between reviewers (p=0.17 for degenerative condition or not, p=0.5 for main diagnosis, p=0.16 for subtype). Accordingly, results were pooled over reviewers. For distinguishing normal/non-progressors from degenerative conditions, the proportions correctly diagnosed were higher with methods B and C than with A (p=0.001, both tests). The difference between method B and C was not statistically significant (p=0.18). For main diagnosis, the proportion of correct diagnoses were highest with method C for all three reviewers; however, this was not statistically significant comparing with method A (p=0.23) or with method B (p=0.16). For subtype diagnosis, there was some evidence that method C was better than method A (p=0.01) and B (p=0.048). Conclusions Serial MRI and registration may improve visual diagnosis in dementia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Neuroradiology |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Pages (from-to) | 987-95 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISSN | 0028-3940 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2010 |