Dismantling the myth of pure Laissez-faire Liberalism

Rune Møller Stahl

Dismantling the myth of pure Laissez-faire Liberalism

Abstract

The paper proposes a rethinking of some of the orthodoxy that have emerged around the understanding of neoliberalism in critical IPE that have emerged in the aftermaths of Foucault’s 1978 lectures (Foucault 2008). Today it is widely accepted that neoliberalism have not in practice meant a retreat of the state from the economy, as a step toward the realisation of the free market ideals of
thinkers such as Milton Friedman and Hayek. Instead neoliberalism is understood as a redefinition of the state-market relationship, and a process of re-regulation as well as de-regulation (see Peck 2010 , Mirowski 2009, Crouch 2011). But this insight is made by contrasting neoliberalism with classical
liberalism, that is, explicit or implicitly, understood as being a full realisation of laissez-faire ideology.
The paper will argue however, that 19th century liberalism, was also characterised by a tension
between economic ideology and the actual practices of political economy. State action played a central role even during the heyday of laissez-faire liberalism.

Original language	English
Publication date	16 Dec 2015
Number of pages	5
Publication status	Published - 16 Dec 2015
Event	After the Crisis? European Crises and Emerging Alternatives. : Second annual IPE Ø/Öresund workshop - Copenhagen, Denmark Duration: 16 Dec 2015 → 16 Dec 2015

Conference

Conference	After the Crisis? European Crises and Emerging Alternatives.
Country/Territory	Denmark
City	Copenhagen
Period	16/12/2015 → 16/12/2015

Access to Document

Rune Stahl - neo- and classical liberalism

Cite this

@conference{a81fb5d7fa0d4404a9ef68d557c8779d,

title = "Dismantling the myth of pure Laissez-faire Liberalism",

abstract = "The paper proposes a rethinking of some of the orthodoxy that have emerged around the understanding of neoliberalism in critical IPE that have emerged in the aftermaths of Foucault{\textquoteright}s 1978 lectures (Foucault 2008). Today it is widely accepted that neoliberalism have not in practice meant a retreat of the state from the economy, as a step toward the realisation of the free market ideals ofthinkers such as Milton Friedman and Hayek. Instead neoliberalism is understood as a redefinition of the state-market relationship, and a process of re-regulation as well as de-regulation (see Peck 2010 , Mirowski 2009, Crouch 2011). But this insight is made by contrasting neoliberalism with classicalliberalism, that is, explicit or implicitly, understood as being a full realisation of laissez-faire ideology.The paper will argue however, that 19th century liberalism, was also characterised by a tensionbetween economic ideology and the actual practices of political economy. State action played a central role even during the heyday of laissez-faire liberalism. ",

author = "Stahl, {Rune M{\o}ller}",

year = "2015",

month = dec,

day = "16",

language = "English",

note = " After the Crisis? European Crises and Emerging Alternatives. ; Conference date: 16-12-2015 Through 16-12-2015",

}

TY - CONF

T1 - Dismantling the myth of pure Laissez-faire Liberalism

AU - Stahl, Rune Møller

PY - 2015/12/16

Y1 - 2015/12/16

N2 - The paper proposes a rethinking of some of the orthodoxy that have emerged around the understanding of neoliberalism in critical IPE that have emerged in the aftermaths of Foucault’s 1978 lectures (Foucault 2008). Today it is widely accepted that neoliberalism have not in practice meant a retreat of the state from the economy, as a step toward the realisation of the free market ideals ofthinkers such as Milton Friedman and Hayek. Instead neoliberalism is understood as a redefinition of the state-market relationship, and a process of re-regulation as well as de-regulation (see Peck 2010 , Mirowski 2009, Crouch 2011). But this insight is made by contrasting neoliberalism with classicalliberalism, that is, explicit or implicitly, understood as being a full realisation of laissez-faire ideology.The paper will argue however, that 19th century liberalism, was also characterised by a tensionbetween economic ideology and the actual practices of political economy. State action played a central role even during the heyday of laissez-faire liberalism.

AB - The paper proposes a rethinking of some of the orthodoxy that have emerged around the understanding of neoliberalism in critical IPE that have emerged in the aftermaths of Foucault’s 1978 lectures (Foucault 2008). Today it is widely accepted that neoliberalism have not in practice meant a retreat of the state from the economy, as a step toward the realisation of the free market ideals ofthinkers such as Milton Friedman and Hayek. Instead neoliberalism is understood as a redefinition of the state-market relationship, and a process of re-regulation as well as de-regulation (see Peck 2010 , Mirowski 2009, Crouch 2011). But this insight is made by contrasting neoliberalism with classicalliberalism, that is, explicit or implicitly, understood as being a full realisation of laissez-faire ideology.The paper will argue however, that 19th century liberalism, was also characterised by a tensionbetween economic ideology and the actual practices of political economy. State action played a central role even during the heyday of laissez-faire liberalism.

M3 - Paper

T2 - After the Crisis? European Crises and Emerging Alternatives.

Y2 - 16 December 2015 through 16 December 2015

ER -

Dismantling the myth of pure Laissez-faire Liberalism

Abstract

Conference

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this