Discursive relationships between landscape science, policy and management practice: concepts, issues and examples

Simon Richard Swaffield; Jørgen Primdahl; Mark Hoversten

doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12

Discursive relationships between landscape science, policy and management practice: concepts, issues and examples

Simon Richard Swaffield, Jørgen Primdahl, Mark Hoversten

Landscape Architecture and Planning

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Different approaches have been proposed to help the science of landscape ecology achieve greater policy relevance. A common feature is the central role of landscape scientists as experts in solving 'place based problems' in effective ways. In practice however landscape ecologists have seldom had the impact they seek. This chapter uses concepts drawn from deliberative planning and case examples from the USA and Denmark to critically examine the science-practice interface between landscape ecology and landscape planning. It highlights the way that different roles, values, and interests interact at different stages in place based studies, and this may require a re-framing of landscape ecological science to become part of a multivalent discourse about landscape conditions and possibilities.

Original language	Danish
Title of host publication	Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture
Number of pages	24
Volume	III
Publisher	Springer
Publication date	1 Sept 2013
Pages	225-248
Chapter	12
ISBN (Print)	978-94-007-6529-0
ISBN (Electronic)	978-94-007-6530-6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12
Publication status	Published - 1 Sept 2013

Access to Document

10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12

Cite this

Discursive relationships between landscape science, policy and management practice : concepts, issues and examples. / Swaffield, Simon Richard; Primdahl, Jørgen; Hoversten, Mark.

Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture. Vol. III Springer, 2013. p. 225-248.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review

@inbook{2d20a315f2d64730bd9b4787cd8032ab,

title = "Discursive relationships between landscape science, policy and management practice: concepts, issues and examples",

abstract = "Different approaches have been proposed to help the science of landscape ecology achieve greater policy relevance. A common feature is the central role of landscape scientists as experts in solving 'place based problems' in effective ways. In practice however landscape ecologists have seldom had the impact they seek. This chapter uses concepts drawn from deliberative planning and case examples from the USA and Denmark to critically examine the science-practice interface between landscape ecology and landscape planning. It highlights the way that different roles, values, and interests interact at different stages in place based studies, and this may require a re-framing of landscape ecological science to become part of a multivalent discourse about landscape conditions and possibilities.",

author = "Swaffield, {Simon Richard} and J{\o}rgen Primdahl and Mark Hoversten",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12",

language = "Dansk",

isbn = "978-94-007-6529-0",

volume = "III",

pages = "225--248",

booktitle = "Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture",

publisher = "Springer",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Discursive relationships between landscape science, policy and management practice

T2 - concepts, issues and examples

AU - Swaffield, Simon Richard

AU - Primdahl, Jørgen

AU - Hoversten, Mark

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Different approaches have been proposed to help the science of landscape ecology achieve greater policy relevance. A common feature is the central role of landscape scientists as experts in solving 'place based problems' in effective ways. In practice however landscape ecologists have seldom had the impact they seek. This chapter uses concepts drawn from deliberative planning and case examples from the USA and Denmark to critically examine the science-practice interface between landscape ecology and landscape planning. It highlights the way that different roles, values, and interests interact at different stages in place based studies, and this may require a re-framing of landscape ecological science to become part of a multivalent discourse about landscape conditions and possibilities.

AB - Different approaches have been proposed to help the science of landscape ecology achieve greater policy relevance. A common feature is the central role of landscape scientists as experts in solving 'place based problems' in effective ways. In practice however landscape ecologists have seldom had the impact they seek. This chapter uses concepts drawn from deliberative planning and case examples from the USA and Denmark to critically examine the science-practice interface between landscape ecology and landscape planning. It highlights the way that different roles, values, and interests interact at different stages in place based studies, and this may require a re-framing of landscape ecological science to become part of a multivalent discourse about landscape conditions and possibilities.

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_12

M3 - Bidrag til bog/antologi

SN - 978-94-007-6529-0

VL - III

SP - 225

EP - 248

BT - Landscape ecology for sustainable environment and culture

PB - Springer

ER -