Abstract
The political system of the EU and its member states is frequently seen as postWestphalian
within constructivist-inspired research. This is based on the view that
political authority and legitimacy are to be found both at the EU level and the national
level with no clear borders between them. The question raised in this article is how the
member states conceive of themselves as foreign policy actors in this situation where
they are both politically embedded in EU foreign policy structures and, in most cases,
formally able to act outside the EU structures in the field of foreign policy. The overall
argument is that a pertinent answer to this question can be provided by looking at how
(or whether) state identity is articulated in relation to the EU. The paper first presents
theoretical considerations relating to discursive articulations of state identity in an EU
context. The relevance of these discursive articulations is then illustrated through the
empirical example of Danish articulations of actorness prior to and post Lisbon. It is
shown that the articulation of national actorness in relation to the EU varied across the
different areas of foreign policy before and after Lisbon. A research agenda that flows
from these considerations is outlined.
within constructivist-inspired research. This is based on the view that
political authority and legitimacy are to be found both at the EU level and the national
level with no clear borders between them. The question raised in this article is how the
member states conceive of themselves as foreign policy actors in this situation where
they are both politically embedded in EU foreign policy structures and, in most cases,
formally able to act outside the EU structures in the field of foreign policy. The overall
argument is that a pertinent answer to this question can be provided by looking at how
(or whether) state identity is articulated in relation to the EU. The paper first presents
theoretical considerations relating to discursive articulations of state identity in an EU
context. The relevance of these discursive articulations is then illustrated through the
empirical example of Danish articulations of actorness prior to and post Lisbon. It is
shown that the articulation of national actorness in relation to the EU varied across the
different areas of foreign policy before and after Lisbon. A research agenda that flows
from these considerations is outlined.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Cooperation and Conflict |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Pages (from-to) | 368-385 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| ISSN | 0010-8367 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2014 |