Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015

TY - JOUR

T1 - Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015

AU - Hämmerle, Christoph H F

AU - Cordaro, Luca

AU - van Assche, Nele

AU - Benic, Goran I

AU - Bornstein, Michael

AU - Gamper, Felix

AU - Gotfredsen, Klaus

AU - Harris, David

AU - Hürzeler, Marc

AU - Jacobs, Reinhilde

AU - Kapos, Theodoros

AU - Kohal, Ralf J

AU - Patzelt, Sebastian B M

AU - Sailer, Irena

AU - Tahmaseb, Ali

AU - Vercruyssen, Marjolein

AU - Wismeijer, Daniel

N1 - © 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The task of this working group was to assess the existing knowledge in computer-assisted implant planning and placement, fabrication of reconstructions applying computers compared to traditional fabrication, and assessments of treatment outcomes using novel imaging techniques.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three reviews were available for assessing the current literature and provided the basis for the discussions and the consensus report. One review dealt with the use of computers to plan implant therapy and to place implants in partially and fully edentulous patients. A second one focused on novel techniques and methods to assess treatment outcomes and the third compared CAD/CAM-fabricated reconstructions to conventionally fabricated ones.RESULTS: The consensus statements, the clinical recommendations, and the implications for research, all of them after approval by the plenum of the consensus conference, are described in this article. The three articles by Vercruyssen et al., Patzelt & Kohal, and Benic et al. are presented separately as part of the supplement of this consensus conference.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The task of this working group was to assess the existing knowledge in computer-assisted implant planning and placement, fabrication of reconstructions applying computers compared to traditional fabrication, and assessments of treatment outcomes using novel imaging techniques.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Three reviews were available for assessing the current literature and provided the basis for the discussions and the consensus report. One review dealt with the use of computers to plan implant therapy and to place implants in partially and fully edentulous patients. A second one focused on novel techniques and methods to assess treatment outcomes and the third compared CAD/CAM-fabricated reconstructions to conventionally fabricated ones.RESULTS: The consensus statements, the clinical recommendations, and the implications for research, all of them after approval by the plenum of the consensus conference, are described in this article. The three articles by Vercruyssen et al., Patzelt & Kohal, and Benic et al. are presented separately as part of the supplement of this consensus conference.

U2 - 10.1111/clr.12648

DO - 10.1111/clr.12648

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26385624

SN - 0905-7161

VL - 26 Suppl 11

SP - 97

EP - 101

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

ER -