Abstract
This article questions the methodological conflation at work in Karen Barad's agential realism. Barad's immense appeal is first explained against the tense background of the nature/culture antagonism in the twentieth century. Then, by using some of the penetrating observations of a seventeen-century philosopher, Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia, Barad's “ethico-onto-epistem-ology” is examined and subsequently criticized for disregarding the persistence of subjectivity, dissolving the ambivalence of the bodily matter(s), and neglecting the need for concrete individuality in ethics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Kvinder, Køn & Forskning |
Volume | 2012 |
Issue number | 1-2 |
Pages (from-to) | 55-65 |
Number of pages | 11 |
ISSN | 0907-6182 |
Publication status | Published - 2012 |