Detection of erythropoietin misuse by the Athlete Biological Passport combined with reticulocyte percentage

Jacob Bejder, Niels Jacob Aachmann-Andersen, Thomas Christian Bonne, Niels Vidiendal Olsen, Nikolai Baastrup Nordsborg*

*Corresponding author for this work
12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The sensitivity of the adaptive model of the Athlete Biological Passport (ABP) and reticulocyte percentage (ret%) in detection of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) misuse was evaluated using both a long-term normal dose and a brief high dose treatment regime. Sixteen subjects received either 65IU rHuEPO×kg-1 every second day for two weeks (normal-dose), 390IU rHuEPO×kg-1 on three consecutive days (high-dose), or frequent placebo treatment for 13days in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover design. Blood variables were measured 4, 11, and 25days following treatment initiation. The ABP based on haemoglobin concentration ([Hb]) and OFF-hr score ([Hb] - 60×√ret%) yielded atypical profiles following both normal-dose and high-dose treatment (0 %, 31 %, 13 % vs. 21 %, 33 %, 20 % at days 4, 11, and 25 after normal and high dose, respectively). Including ret% as a stand-alone marker for atypical blood profiles increased (P<0.05) the sensitivity of the adaptive model at day 11 to 63 % and 67 % for normal-dose and high-dose rHuEPO administration, respectively. In conclusion, ~30 % of subjects injecting a normal-dose rHuEPO for two weeks or a high-dose rHuEPO for three days will present an atypical ABP profile. Including ret% as a stand-alone parameter improves the sensitivity two-fold.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDrug Testing and Analysis
Volume8
Issue number10
Pages (from-to)1049-1055
Number of pages7
ISSN1942-7603
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Blood manipulation
  • Doping control
  • Recombinant human erythropoietin

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Detection of erythropoietin misuse by the Athlete Biological Passport combined with reticulocyte percentage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this