Abstract
In Denmark political commentary is still a relatively new phenomenon. This paper analyzes the metadiscourse in relation to political commentary to identify the different understandings that have coalesced around political commentary as a genre. I argue that people in different positions (e.g. citizens, politicians, journalists, political editors, chief editors and political commentators themselves) emphasize different explanations for the rise of the genre and thereby functions of political commentary as part of an argumentative strategy favouring their own interests
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Argumentation: Cognition and Community. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) |
Volume | Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of OSSA, May 18-21, 2011. Windsor, ON (CD ROM) |
Pages (from-to) | 1-8 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Faculty of Humanities