Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Steffen Altmann; Armin Falk; Paul Heidhues; Rajshri  Jayaraman

Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Steffen Altmann, Armin Falk, Paul Heidhues, Rajshri Jayaraman

Abstract

We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an "add-on" decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.

Original language	English
Publisher	Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)
Number of pages	44
Publication status	Published - 2014

Series	IZA Discussion Paper
Number	8680

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

http://ftp.iza.org/dp8680.pdf

Cite this

@techreport{4525a00656ce4f6fa99282ebcf4a5738,

title = "Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment",

abstract = "We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an {"}add-on{"} decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.",

author = "Steffen Altmann and Armin Falk and Paul Heidhues and Rajshri Jayaraman",

note = "JEL Classification: C93, D03, D64",

year = "2014",

language = "English",

series = "IZA Discussion Paper",

number = "8680",

publisher = "Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)",

type = "WorkingPaper",

institution = "Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Defaults and Donations

T2 - Evidence from a Field Experiment

AU - Altmann, Steffen

AU - Falk, Armin

AU - Heidhues, Paul

AU - Jayaraman, Rajshri

N1 - JEL Classification: C93, D03, D64

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an "add-on" decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.

AB - We study how website defaults affect consumer behavior in the domain of charitable giving. In a field experiment that was conducted on a large platform for making charitable donations over the web, we exogenously vary the default options in two distinct choice dimensions. The first pertains to the primary donation decision, namely, how much to contribute to the charitable cause. The second relates to an "add-on" decision of how much to contribute to supporting the online platform itself. We find a strong impact of defaults on individual behavior: in each of our treatments, the modal positive contributions in both choice dimensions invariably correspond to the specified default amounts. Defaults, nevertheless, have no impact on aggregate donations. This is because defaults in the donation domain induce some people to donate more and others to donate less than they otherwise would have. In contrast, higher defaults in the secondary choice dimension unambiguously induce higher contributions to the online platform.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - IZA Discussion Paper

BT - Defaults and Donations

PB - Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

ER -

Defaults and Donations: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this