Covariate analysis of QTc and T-wave morphology: new possibilities in the evaluation of drugs that affect cardiac repolarization

Claus Graff, Johannes J. Struijk, J Matz, Jørgen K. Kanters, M P Andersen, J Nielsen, E Toft

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study adds the dimension of a T-wave morphology composite score (MCS) to the QTc interval-based evaluation of drugs that affect cardiac repolarization. Electrocardiographic recordings from 62 subjects on placebo and 400mg moxifloxacin were compared with those from 21 subjects on 160 and 320mg D,L-sotalol. T-wave morphology changes, as assessed by ΔMCS, are larger after 320mg D,L-sotalol than after 160mg D,L-sotalol; and the changes associated with 160mg D,L-sotalol are, in turn, larger than those associated with moxifloxacin and placebo. Covariate analyses of ΔQTc and ΔMCS showed that changes in T-wave morphology are a significant effect of D,L-sotalol. By contrast, moxifloxacin was found to have no significant effect on T-wave morphology (ΔMCS) at any given change in QTc. This study offers new insights into the repolarization behavior of a drug associated with low cardiac risk vs. one associated with a high risk and describes the added benefits of a T-wave MCS as a covariate to the assessment of the QTc interval.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Volume88
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)88-94
Number of pages7
ISSN0009-9236
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2010

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Algorithms
  • Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Aza Compounds
  • Cardiovascular Agents
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Electrocardiography
  • Female
  • Heart
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pharmaceutical Preparations
  • Quinolines
  • Risk Assessment
  • Sotalol
  • Torsades de Pointes
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Covariate analysis of QTc and T-wave morphology: new possibilities in the evaluation of drugs that affect cardiac repolarization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this