Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary

Jens Elo Rytter

doi:10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004

Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary

CECS - Centre for European and Comparative Legal Studies

Abstract

The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.

Translated title of the contribution	Anti-terror domstolsprøvelse ved traditionelt tilbageholdende domstole
Original language	English
Title of host publication	Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review
Editors	Fiona de Londras, Fergal F. Davis
Number of pages	19
Place of Publication	Cambridge
Publisher	Cambridge University Press
Publication date	1 Oct 2014
Pages	56-74
Chapter	2
ISBN (Print)	9781107053618, 9781107662964
ISBN (Electronic)	9781107282124
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004
Publication status	Published - 1 Oct 2014

Keywords

Faculty of Law

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004

Cite this

@inbook{17c9014171f848a497860331a7579346,

title = "Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary",

abstract = "The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.",

keywords = "Faculty of Law, domstolskontrol, terrorisme , danmark",

author = "Rytter, {Jens Elo}",

year = "2014",

month = oct,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781107053618",

pages = "56--74",

editor = "{de Londras}, Fiona and Davis, {Fergal F. }",

booktitle = "Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

address = "United Kingdom",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Counter-terrorism judicial review by a traditionally weak judiciary

AU - Rytter, Jens Elo

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.

AB - The article analyses recent Danish case law on counter-terrorism measures to ascertain the extent to which a tradiitonally weak judiciary like the Danish one performs a real review. The conclusion is that the review is real, but measured.

KW - Faculty of Law

KW - domstolskontrol

KW - terrorisme

KW - danmark

U2 - 10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004

DO - 10.1017/cbo9781107282124.004

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9781107053618

SN - 9781107662964

SP - 56

EP - 74

BT - Critical Debates on Counter-Terrorism Judicial Review

A2 - de Londras, Fiona

A2 - Davis, Fergal F.

PB - Cambridge University Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -