Abstract
A ‘burden reducing’ agenda has spurred an increased interest in how EU environmental legislation is transposed into national legislation—most prominently reflected in the principle of ‘no gold-plating’. Yet, an important question is to what extent transposition principles and practices may ensure a coherent and accessible body of environmental legislation, while at the same time ensuring adequate transposition of EU environmental legislation. This article analyses the existence, or emergence, of transposition principles and practices in three Member States—the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Denmark. It also examines how EU initiatives may influence these principles and practices. The article concludes that the steering of transposition processes by general transposition principles and objectives alone, and in particular those dominated by a ‘burden reducing’ agenda, has a limited focus on coherence and accessibility with respect to environmental legislation and that such issues deserve more attention in the transposition process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Law |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 17-44 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| ISSN | 0952-8873 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2015 |