Contact allergy in Danish children: Current trends

Anne B. Simonsen*, Majken H. Foss-Skiftesvik, Jacob P. Thyssen, Mette Deleuran, Charlotte G. Mortz, Claus Zachariae, Lone Skov, Morten Osterballe, Anne Funding, Christian Avnstorp, Bo L. Andersen, Susanne Vissing, Anne Danielsen, Nathalie Dufour, Niels H. Nielsen, Henrik Thormann, Mette Sommerlund, Jeanne D. Johansen

*Corresponding author for this work
17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Contact allergy is common in children, but may be underdiagnosed. Importantly, the clinical relevance of specific allergies is subject to constant change, and it is therefore important to continuously monitor the trends and changes of contact allergies in the paediatric population. Objectives: To identify possible changes in contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis among Danish children referred for patch testing. Methods: A retrospective study was performed based on patch test data from the Danish National Database of Contact allergy. The current data were compared with previously published data on Danish children referred for patch testing. Results: Between 2012 and 2016, 1573 children and adolescents were patch tested. Overall, 385 (24.5%) had at least 1 positive patch test reaction. The overall prevalence was similar in boys and girls, across age groups, and in patients with and without atopic dermatitis. Statistically significant increases in contact allergy to fragrances and isothiazoliones were seen, whereas a decrease in nickel allergy was found. Conclusion: Allergic contact dermatitis continues to be a common disease in children, and is even significantly increasing for some allergens.

Original languageEnglish
JournalContact Dermatitis
Volume79
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)295-302
Number of pages8
ISSN0105-1873
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • allergic contact dermatitis
  • children
  • contact allergy
  • epidemiology
  • patch testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contact allergy in Danish children: Current trends'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this