Conformation-specific anti-Mad2 monoclonal antibodies for the dissection of checkpoint signaling

Garry G Sedgwick, Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen, Tiziana Lischetti, Werner Streicher, Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen, Jesper V Olsen, Jakob Nilsson

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis by delaying the activation of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) in response to unattached kinetochores. The Mad2 protein is essential for a functional checkpoint because it binds directly to Cdc20, the mitotic co-activator of the APC/C, thereby inhibiting progression into anaphase. Mad2 exists in at least 2 different conformations, open-Mad2 (O-Mad2) and closed-Mad2 (C-Mad2), with the latter representing the active form that is able to bind Cdc20. Our ability to dissect Mad2 biology in vivo is limited by the absence of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) useful for recognizing the different conformations of Mad2. Here, we describe and extensively characterize mAbs specific for either O-Mad2 or C-Mad2, as well as a pan-Mad2 antibody, and use these to investigate the different Mad2 complexes present in mitotic cells. Our antibodies validate current Mad2 models but also suggest that O-Mad2 can associate with checkpoint complexes, most likely through dimerization with C-Mad2. Furthermore, we investigate the makeup of checkpoint complexes bound to the APC/C, which indicate the presence of both Cdc20-BubR1-Bub3 and Mad2-Cdc20-BubR1-Bub3 complexes, with Cdc20 being ubiquitinated in both. Thus, our defined mAbs provide insight into checkpoint signaling and provide useful tools for future research on Mad2 function and regulation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalmAbs
Volume8
Issue number4
Pages (from-to)689-697
Number of pages9
ISSN1942-0862
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 May 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conformation-specific anti-Mad2 monoclonal antibodies for the dissection of checkpoint signaling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this