Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Copenhagen Research Portal Home
Help & FAQ
Dansk
English
Home
Profiles
Research output
Research units
Press/Media
Activities
Prizes
???studenttheses???
Datasets
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation
Jordan O. Hampton
*
, Bruce Warburton,
Peter Sandøe
*
Corresponding author for this work
Section for Consumption, Bioethics and Governance
17
Citations (Scopus)
21
Downloads (Pure)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Compassionate versus consequentialist conservation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Consequentialist
100%
Overabundant
100%
Ethical Attitude
100%
Welfare State
100%
Wildlife
50%
Wild Herbivores
50%
Conservation Targets
50%
Meat
50%
Heterospecific
50%
Population Reduction
50%
Positive Welfare
50%
Animal Welfare
50%
Ethical Framework
25%
Deontology
25%
Wildlife Conservation
25%
Economic Cost
25%
Resource Depletion
25%
Wildlife Management
25%
Starvation
25%
Animal Rights
25%
Welfare Effects
25%
Poor Welfare
25%
Wild Animals
25%
Unintentional Injury
25%
Conservation Priorities
25%
Minimal Cost
25%
Welfare Economics
25%
In Situ
25%
Virtue Ethics
25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Animal Welfare
100%
Rearing
50%
Offspring
50%
Ethics
50%
Animal Rights
50%
Wildlife Management
50%
Wild Animal
50%